OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

08 Richardson Construction: OSHA inspections and violations

Foster, Rhode Island · Industrial Building Construction · NAICS 236210

1inspections
5citation items
$8,413current penalties
Oct 3, 2022last inspection

OSHA has inspected 08 Richardson Construction once in Rhode Island.

The inspection began on Oct 3, 2022 after a complaint, in Foster.

That inspection ended with 5 citation items: 3 serious and 2 other-than-serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $8,413 and still stand at $8,413.

Proving cited hazards were fixed comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 1903.19.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and 08 Richardson Construction averages $8,413 (1 cited inspection).

08 Richardson Construction: OSHA citation items per year, 2022 to 2022
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Rhode Island · latest 90 days of OSHA records

82employers cited

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Rhode Island: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in Rhode Island

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch 08 Richardson Construction and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 346256555 OPENED OCT 3, 2022Closed

Complaint · Partial · Safety · 4 employees at the site · Closed Mar 17, 2026

175 Danielson Pike, Foster, RI 02825 · Industrial Building Construction · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.405(b)(2) · Job-site wiring
 Serious$4,688$4,688Feb 14, 2023Final
Citation 1, item 2a
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(14) · Fall protection in construction
 Serious$3,349$3,349Feb 14, 2023Final
Citation 1, item 2b
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1) · Fall protection training in construction
 Serious$0$0Feb 14, 2023Final
Citation 2, item 1a
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1) · Proving cited hazards were fixed
 Other-than-serious$376$376May 10, 2023Final
Citation 2, item 1b
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1) · Proving cited hazards were fixed
 Other-than-serious$0$0May 10, 2023Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1903.19 · Proving cited hazards were fixed

29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1)

(c) Abatement certification. (1) Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.

29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1)

(d) Abatement documentation. (1) The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.

29 CFR 1926.405 · Job-site wiring

29 CFR 1926.405(b)(2)

(2) Covers and canopies. All pull boxes, junction boxes, and fittings shall be provided with covers. If metal covers are used, they shall be grounded. In energized installations each outlet box shall have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy. Covers of outlet boxes having holes through which flexible cord pendants pass shall be provided with bushings designed for the purpose or shall have smooth, well-rounded surfaces on which the cords may bear.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.503 · Fall protection training in construction

Other industrial building construction employers in Rhode Island

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Rhode Island the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.