OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

180 Snacks Inc.: OSHA inspections and violations

Anaheim, California · Roasted Nuts and Peanut Butter Manufacturing · NAICS 311911

2inspections
9citation items
$5,325current penalties
Dec 3, 2025last inspection

OSHA has inspected 180 Snacks Inc. 2 times in California since 2021.

The latest one began on Dec 3, 2025 after an accident, in Anaheim; the case is still open.

Those inspections ended with 9 citation items: 1 repeat and 8 other-than-serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $8,760 and now stand at $5,325, 39% lower after settlements or reviews.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for manufacturing employers since 2015 is $4,872, and 180 Snacks Inc. averages $2,662 (2 cited inspections).

180 Snacks Inc.: OSHA citation items per year, 2021 to 2025
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites 180 Snacks Inc. again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 348622085 OPENED DEC 3, 2025Open

Accident · Partial · Safety · 70 employees at the site · Open

1173 North Armando Street, Anaheim, CA 92806 · Roasted Nuts and Peanut Butter Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1 Other-than-serious$400$400Mar 18, 2026Contested
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 3203(A)(4)
Other-than-serious$300$300Mar 18, 2026Contested
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 3314(C)
Other-than-serious$800$800Mar 18, 2026Contested
Citation 1, item 4
29 CFR 3314(G)(2)(A)
Other-than-serious$200$200Mar 18, 2026Contested
Citation 1, item 5
29 CFR 3314(J)
Repeat$900$900Mar 18, 2026Contested

Inspection 345527964 OPENED SEP 14, 2021Closed

Accident · Partial · Safety · 36 employees at the site · Closed Jun 23, 2025

1173 North Armando Street, Anaheim, CA 92806 · Roasted Nuts and Peanut Butter Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Incident on Aug 30, 2021: Employee cleaning belt amputates finger when pulled into con

At 5:45 p.m. on August 30, 2021, an employee working as a line worker for a snack food manufacturer was working in the sorting and roasting department. The employee has been working for the employer for over a year. A coworker, supervisor, assigned the employee the task of cleaning the conveyor belt at the AC Horn Roasting machine #1, shop number 2020-05601-02. The employee sprayed the conveyor belt with liquid disinfection and started to wipe the machine with a cloth. There were no coworkers working in the area at the time and therefore no witnesses. The employee failed to deenergized the machine as trained. The rag she was using became entangled in the machinery and caused his left hand to be pulled into the machine. The employee received medical treatment without hospitalization for an amputated index finger.

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 342(A)
Other-than-serious$5,000$2,000Jan 31, 2022Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 461(A)
Other-than-serious$275$275Jan 31, 2022Final
Citation 1, item 3 Other-than-serious$275$0Jan 31, 2022Final
Citation 1, item 4
29 CFR 3314(J)
Other-than-serious$610$450Jan 31, 2022Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 4300.29

29 CFR 4300.40

Other roasted nuts and peanut butter manufacturing employers in California

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.