Since 1987, OSHA inspectors have visited Accurpress Inc in Minnesota 6 times.
The most recent inspection opened on Oct 7, 2025 as a planned inspection, in Willmar.
In all, OSHA issued 14 citation items: 13 serious and 1 other-than-serious.
The proposed penalties came to $4,650; today they stand at $3,165, 32% less.
The rule cited most here is 5205.116 (), 2 times.
Among manufacturing employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,600 penalty. Accurpress Inc averages $845 across 3 cited inspections.
Accurpress Inc also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.
Citation items per year, by inspection date.
Minnesota · latest 90 days of OSHA records
381employers cited
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Minnesota: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.
In 2025, the Willmar site logged 6 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 29 workers: 24.0 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 2.3 for its industry. Those cases cost 5 days away from work.
Site and year
Workers
Cases
Days-away cases
Rate
Industry median
Accurpress Inc.
Willmar · 2025
29
6
2
24.0
2.3
The rules behind these citations
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.110 · Storage and handling of liquefied petroleum gases
29 CFR 1910.110(e)(4)(iii)
(iii) Permanent and removable fuel containers shall be securely mounted to prevent jarring loose, slipping, or rotating, and the fastenings shall be designed and constructed to withstand static loading in any direction equal to twice the weight of the tank and attachments when filled with fuel using a safety factor of not less than four based on the ultimate strength of the material to be used. Field welding, when necessary, shall be made only on saddle plates, lugs or brackets, originally attached to the container by the tank manufacturer.
(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.
(1) All places of employment, passageways, storerooms, service rooms, and walking-working surfaces are kept in a clean, orderly, and sanitary condition.
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Minnesota the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.
