OSHA has inspected Aersale Components Solutions once in New Mexico.
The inspection began on May 8, 2024 after a fatality or catastrophe, in Rio Rancho.
That inspection ended with 11 citation items: 10 serious and 1 other-than-serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $129,568 and now stand at $67,501, 48% lower after settlements or reviews.
Cadmium comes up most often in these citations: 8 items under 1910.1027.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for manufacturing employers since 2015 is $3,600, and Aersale Components Solutions averages $67,501 (1 cited inspection).
1 inspection on this page followed a fatal incident.
Aersale Components Solutions also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.
Citation items per year, by inspection date.
New Mexico · latest 90 days of OSHA records
35employers cited
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in New Mexico: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Aersale Components Solutions and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.
Incident on May 2, 2024 (fatal): Employee inhales plastic dust, later dies from pneumonia
At 10:00 a.m. on February 23, 2024, an employee working as a machine operator for an aircraft parts manufacturer was working in the fabrication department. The employee inhaled plastic dust which led to the employee developing pneumonia. At 9:00 a.m. on May 2, 2024, the employee died from the disease.
From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.
In 2020, the Rio Rancho site logged 0 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 100 workers: 0.0 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 3.0 for its industry.
Site and year
Workers
Cases
Days-away cases
Rate
Industry median
Alnm-Ami-Albuquerque - NM
Rio Rancho · 2020
100
0
0
0.0
3.0
The rules behind these citations
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
(2) Scheduled monitoring option. (i) The employer shall perform initial monitoring to determine the 8-hour TWA exposure for each employee on the basis of a sufficient number of personal breathing zone air samples to accurately characterize full shift exposure on each shift, for each job classification, in each work area. Where an employer does representative sampling instead of sampling all employees in order to meet this requirement, the employer shall sample the employee(s) expected to have the highest chromium (VI) exposures.
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(2)(iv)
(iv) If monitoring reveals employee exposures to be above the PEL, the employer shall perform periodic monitoring at least every three months.
29 CFR 1910.1026(k)(2)(i)
(i) Within 30 days after initial assignment, unless the employee has received a chromium (VI) related medical examination that meets the requirements of this paragraph within the last twelve months;
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in New Mexico the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.
