OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Agropur Inc: OSHA inspections and violations

St. Paul, Minnesota · Fluid Milk Manufacturing · NAICS 311511

2inspections
7citation items
$9,275current penalties
Feb 19, 2026last inspection

Agropur Inc has 2 OSHA inspections on record in Minnesota, the first in 2013.

OSHA's last visit started on Feb 19, 2026 as a planned inspection, in Le Sueur.

Across those inspections OSHA issued 7 citation items: 4 serious and 3 other-than-serious.

OSHA proposed $16,450 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $9,275, down 44%.

Most often, OSHA cited 1910.151, first aid and eyewash (2 items).

For context, across all manufacturing employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $4,873. Agropur Inc averages $5,600 over 1 cited inspection in that time.

Agropur Inc also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.

Agropur Inc: OSHA citation items per year, 2013 to 2026
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Minnesota · latest 90 days of OSHA records

381employers cited

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Minnesota: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in Minnesota

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Agropur Inc and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 348801598 OPENED FEB 19, 2026Closed

Planned · Complete · Safety · 263 employees at the site · Closed Aug 28, 2026

719 North Main Street, Le Sueur, MN 56058 · Cheese Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1 Other-than-serious$2,100$1,050Apr 23, 2026Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1910.151(c) · First aid and eyewash
 Other-than-serious$3,500$1,750Apr 23, 2026Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding
 Serious$2,100$1,050Apr 23, 2026Final
Citation 1, item 4
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i) · Electrical equipment, general requirements
 Other-than-serious$3,500$1,750Apr 23, 2026Final

Inspection 317266559 OPENED AUG 6, 2013Closed

Planned · Complete · Health · 225 employees at the site · Closed Nov 14, 2013

2080 Rice Street, St. Paul, MN 55113 · Fluid Milk Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(1) · Process safety management
 Serious$3,150$2,205Oct 11, 2013Closed
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1910.146(e)(6) · Permit-required confined spaces
 Serious$1,050$735Oct 11, 2013Closed
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1910.151(c) · First aid and eyewash
 Serious$1,050$735Oct 11, 2013Closed

Injury and illness logs

From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.

In 2025, the Le Sueur site logged 8 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 272 workers: 3.3 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 4.2 for its industry. Those cases cost 229 days away from work.

Site and yearWorkersCasesDays-away casesRateIndustry median
Agropur Inc. - Le Sueur Cheese
Le Sueur · 2025
272 843.34.2
Agropur Inc. Ingredients
Le Sueur · 2025
58 000.04.2
Agropur-Le Sueur Cheese Company
Le Sueur · 2022
169 1588.84.2
Agropur-Le Sueur Food Ingredients
Le Sueur · 2022
70 304.34.2
Agropur- Natrel Division - St. Paul
St. Paul · 2018
200 1074.34.2
Agropur Le Sueur Cheese
Le Sueur · 2017
194 1125.34.2
Agropur Le Sueur Food Ingredients
Le Sueur · 2017
80 709.34.2

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.119 · Process safety management

29 CFR 1910.119(e)(1)

(e) Process hazard analysis. (1) The employer shall perform an initial process hazard analysis (hazard evaluation) on processes covered by this standard. The process hazard analysis shall be appropriate to the complexity of the process and shall identify, evaluate, and control the hazards involved in the process. Employers shall determine and document the priority order for conducting process hazard analyses based on a rationale which includes such considerations as extent of the process hazards, number of potentially affected employees, age of the process, and operating history of the process. The process hazard analysis shall be conducted as soon as possible, but not later than the following schedule:

29 CFR 1910.146 · Permit-required confined spaces

29 CFR 1910.146(e)(6)

(6) The employer shall retain each canceled entry permit for at least 1 year to facilitate the review of the permit-required confined space program required by paragraph (d)(14) of this section. Any problems encountered during an entry operation shall be noted on the pertinent permit so that appropriate revisions to the permit space program can be made.

29 CFR 1910.151 · First aid and eyewash

29 CFR 1910.151(c)

(c) Where the eyes or body of any person may be exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body shall be provided within the work area for immediate emergency use.

29 CFR 1910.212 · Machine guarding

29 CFR 1910.25 · Stairways

29 CFR 1910.303 · Electrical equipment, general requirements

Other fluid milk manufacturing employers in Minnesota

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Minnesota the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.