OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Alarcon Bohm Corp: OSHA inspections and violations

Oakland, California · Site Preparation Contractors · NAICS 238910

4inspections
17citation items
$34,370current penalties
Oct 14, 2025last inspection

Alarcon Bohm Corp has 4 OSHA inspections on record in California, the first in 2001.

OSHA's last visit started on Oct 14, 2025 after a complaint, in San Francisco.

Across those inspections OSHA issued 17 citation items: 6 serious and 11 other-than-serious.

OSHA proposed $36,620 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $34,370, down 6%.

For context, across all construction employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,080. Alarcon Bohm Corp averages $14,805 over 2 cited inspections in that time.

Alarcon Bohm Corp: OSHA citation items per year, 2001 to 2025
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

California · latest 90 days of OSHA records

1,128employers cited

5 of them in the same industry

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in California: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in California

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Alarcon Bohm Corp and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 348554015 OPENED OCT 14, 2025Closed

Complaint · Partial · Safety · 20 employees at the site · Closed Jan 12, 2026

429 Castro Street, San Francisco, CA 94114 · All Other Specialty Trade Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 341(C)(1)(A)
Other-than-serious$350$350Dec 22, 2025Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1509(C)
Other-than-serious$350$350Dec 22, 2025Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1512(F)
Other-than-serious$525$525Dec 22, 2025Final
Citation 1, item 4
29 CFR 1514(A)
Other-than-serious$525$525Dec 22, 2025Final
Citation 1, item 5 Other-than-serious$525$525Dec 22, 2025Final
Citation 1, item 6
29 CFR 1629(C)(3)
Other-than-serious$525$525Dec 22, 2025Final
Citation 1, item 7 Other-than-serious$525$525Dec 22, 2025Final
Citation 1, item 8
29 CFR 3664(A)
Other-than-serious$525$525Dec 22, 2025Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1541(L)(1)
Serious$6,300$6,300Dec 22, 2025Final
Citation 3, item 1
29 CFR 1712(C)(1)
Serious$6,300$6,300Dec 22, 2025Final
Citation 4, item 1
29 CFR 1740(G)
Serious$6,300$6,300Dec 22, 2025Final
Citation 5, item 1
29 CFR 3577(B)
Serious$6,300$6,300Dec 22, 2025Final

Inspection 340850007 OPENED AUG 13, 2015Closed

Complaint · Partial · Safety · 12 employees at the site · Closed Sep 29, 2015

175 Burma Road, Oakland, CA 94607 · Commercial and Institutional Building Construction · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 341(C)(1)(A)
Other-than-serious$560$560Aug 26, 2015Final

Inspection 310092788 OPENED SEP 28, 2007Closed

Accident · Partial · Safety · 6 employees at the site · Closed Dec 31, 2008

1000 Grandview Drive, South San Francisco, CA 94080 · Site Preparation Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Incident on Sep 26, 2007: Employee injured when falling truss strikes leg

On the morning of September 27, 2007, Employee #1, of the Alarcon Bohm Corporati on, was working as a laborer cleaning up debris from the ongoing demolition of a mezzanine structure inside a building in South San Francisco, CA. At approximat ely 7:30 a.m. that same day, a coworker used a reciprocating saw to make a serie s of cuts from above on the mezzanine floor, releasing one end of a floor suppor t truss section that was about 20 ft long and weighed an estimated 80 to 100 lb. The other end remained connected to a beam above the main floor. The free end o f the truss then swung downward about 11 ft to the floor, striking Employee #1 a s he was walking under it. The truss landed on his lower right leg, fracturing t he tibia and fibula. Employee #1 was transported to Peninsula Hospital, where he underwent surgery on his leg; he was released on September 28, 2007. At the tim e of the accident, another laborer and an Alarcon foreman were standing nearby. The coworker cutting the trusses free could not be seen by Employee #1, as he ha d walked about 60 ft from his previous position under the mezzanine to the point where he was struck. Subsequent investigation found that no barricades or warni ng tapes were in place on the floor areas underneath the mezzanine to prevent wo rkers from walking into the danger zone where the trusses were being removed. In addition, the floor support trusses were being taken down by hand without the u se of scaffolding, elevating work platforms or aerial devices for employee safet y. The employer was cited for violations of T8CCR 1735(o), Demolishing Buildings : Planks spanning the distance between adequate beams shall be used where necess ary as asubstitute for weakened floors, and as access walkways over open or weak ened areas. When demolishing floors and roofs, employees shall be prohibited fro m working below this activity. Demolition of floor spaces shall continue until a ll unsupported flooring is removed. When employees are required to remove floor support beams, wall sections, etc., by hand, scaffolding as described in Article 21 of the Construction Safety Orders or elevating work platforms and aerial dev ices as described in Article 24 of the General Industry Safety Orders shall be p rovided and used where necessary to insure employee safety. The employer was als o cited for a violation of T8CCR 1736(f), Disposal of Waste Material: When debri s is dropped through holes in the floor without the use of chutes, the area onto which the material is dropped shall be completely enclosed with barricades not less than 42 in. high, and not less than 6 ft back from the projected edge of th e opening above. Signs warning of the hazard of falling materials shall be poste d at each level. Debris removal shall not be permitted in this lower drop area u ntil debris handling ceases above.

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1736 F
Serious$3,600$1,350Jan 9, 2008Final

Inspection 301130506 OPENED OCT 31, 2001Closed

Referral · Partial · Safety · 9 employees at the site · Closed Oct 6, 2006

222 14th St, Oakland, CA 94612 · Site Preparation Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1509 A
Other-than-serious$325$325Apr 10, 2002Closed
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1509 C
Other-than-serious$160$160Apr 10, 2002Closed
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1646 B01
Serious$2,925$2,925Apr 10, 2002Closed

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1541.1

29 CFR 2405.2

Other site preparation contractors employers in California

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in California the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.