Inspection 342277019 OPENED APR 26, 2017Closed
7999 E Kenyon Ave., Denver, CO 80237 · New Multifamily Housing Construction (except For-Sale Builders) · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
OSHA has inspected Alejandro Hernandez 3 times in Colorado since 2000.
The latest one began on Apr 26, 2017 to follow up on an earlier case, in Denver.
Those inspections ended with 11 citation items: 11 serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $6,690 and still stand at $6,690.
Scaffolds, general requirements comes up most often in these citations: 5 items under 1926.451.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,079, and Alejandro Hernandez averages $4,890 (1 cited inspection).
Want to know if OSHA cites Alejandro Hernandez again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company7999 E Kenyon Ave., Denver, CO 80237 · New Multifamily Housing Construction (except For-Sale Builders) · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
7999 E. Kenyon Ave., Denver, CO 80237 · New Multifamily Housing Construction (except For-Sale Builders) · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) · Eye and face protection in construction |
Serious | $1,630 | $1,630 | Mar 17, 2017 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $1,630 | $1,630 | Mar 17, 2017 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction |
Serious | $1,630 | $1,630 | Mar 17, 2017 | Final |
Subdivision, Lot 52, Windsor, Windsor, CO 80534 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1a 29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1) · Scaffolds, general requirements |
Serious | $450 | $450 | Jul 27, 2000 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 1b 29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2) · Scaffolds, general requirements |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Jul 27, 2000 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 1c 29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1) · Scaffolds, general requirements |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Jul 27, 2000 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 2a 29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7) · Scaffolds, general requirements |
Serious | $450 | $450 | Jul 27, 2000 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 2b 29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii) · Scaffolds, general requirements |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Jul 27, 2000 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1926.100(a) · Hard hats in construction |
Serious | $450 | $450 | Jul 27, 2000 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 4a 29 CFR 1926.403(b)(2) · Electrical equipment on job sites |
Serious | $450 | $450 | Jul 27, 2000 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 4b 29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i) · Ground-fault protection on job sites |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Jul 27, 2000 | Closed |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.100(a)
(a) Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets.
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1)
(a) General. (1) The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)
(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.