Sharon Springs, New York · Steel Investment Foundries · NAICS 331512
Since 1978, OSHA inspectors have visited Amt, Inc. in New York 3 times.
The most recent inspection opened on Jul 19, 2022 on a referral, in Sharon Springs.
In all, OSHA issued 6 citation items: 1 serious and 5 other-than-serious.
The proposed penalties came to $17,403; today they stand at $10,442, 40% less.
The rule cited most here is 1910.212 (machine guarding), 3 times.
Among manufacturing employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,600 penalty. Amt, Inc. averages $10,442 across 1 cited inspection.
Amt, Inc. also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.
It reported 1 severe injury to OSHA since 2015.
Want to know if OSHA cites Amt, Inc. again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company883 Chestnut St., Sharon Springs, NY 13459 · Steel Investment Foundries · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $10,151 | $6,091 | Nov 29, 2022 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2) · Reporting deaths and severe injuries |
Other-than-serious | $7,252 | $4,351 | Nov 29, 2022 | Final |
883 Chestnut St., Sharon Springs, NY 13459 · Steel Investment Foundries · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
575 Park Avenue, Huntington, NY 11743 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Nov 14, 1978 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1910.212(b) · Machine guarding |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Nov 14, 1978 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1910.215(a)(2) · Grinders and abrasive wheels |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Nov 14, 1978 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 4 | Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Nov 14, 1978 | Closed |
From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.
In 2025, the Sharon Springs site logged 3 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 50 workers: 7.6 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 5.4 for its industry. Those cases cost 1 days away from work.
| Site and year | Workers | Cases | Days-away cases | Rate | Industry median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMT Inc. Sharon Springs · 2025 | 50 | 3 | 1 | 7.6 | 5.4 |
| AMT, Inc. Sharon Springs · 2021 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 5.4 |
Employers must report any work-related amputation, in-patient hospitalization or loss of an eye to OSHA within 24 hours. 1 report on file.
Jun 23, 2022, Sharon Springs: Amputation · amputations · finger(s), fingernail(s), n.e.c.
An employee was operating a punch press. The press crushed the employee's finger which had to be medically amputated.
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2)
(2) Within twenty-four (24) hours after the in-patient hospitalization of one or more employees or an employee's amputation or an employee's loss of an eye, as a result of a work-related incident, you must report the in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye to OSHA.
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)
(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii)
(ii) The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, shall be guarded. The guarding device shall be in conformity with any appropriate standards therefor, or, in the absence of applicable specific standards, shall be so designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.