OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Anderson Construction: OSHA inspections and violations

Edison, New Jersey · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160

3inspections
6citation items
$17,301current penalties
Feb 24, 2020last inspection

Since 2015, OSHA inspectors have visited Anderson Construction in New Jersey 3 times.

The most recent inspection opened on Feb 24, 2020 on a referral, in Linden.

In all, OSHA issued 6 citation items: 5 serious and 1 repeat.

The proposed penalties came to $21,484; today they stand at $17,301, 19% less.

The rule cited most here is 1926.501 (fall protection in construction), 3 times.

Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,080 penalty. Anderson Construction averages $5,767 across 3 cited inspections.

Anderson Construction: OSHA citation items per year, 2015 to 2020
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

New Jersey · latest 90 days of OSHA records

270employers cited

36 of them in the same industry

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in New Jersey: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in New Jersey

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Anderson Construction and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 344649108 OPENED FEB 24, 2020Closed

Referral · Partial · Safety · 2 employees at the site · Closed Feb 24, 2023

419 Cranford Ave, Linden, NJ 07036 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) · Eye and face protection in construction
Serious$3,470$3,470Mar 5, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$4,048$4,048Mar 5, 2020Final

Inspection 342289972 OPENED JUN 7, 2017Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 3 employees at the site · Closed Jan 28, 2019

11 Kilmer Dr., Colonia, NJ 07067 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Repeat$8,366$4,183Jul 26, 2017Final

Inspection 340860519 OPENED AUG 19, 2015Closed

Complaint · Partial · Safety · 6 employees at the site · Closed Mar 8, 2019

9 Koster Blvd. Building 22, Edison, NJ 08837 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.100(a) · Hard hats in construction
Serious$1,200$1,200Dec 4, 2015Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) · Eye and face protection in construction
Serious$1,600$1,600Dec 4, 2015Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$2,800$2,800Dec 4, 2015Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.100 · Hard hats in construction

29 CFR 1926.100(a)

(a) Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets.

29 CFR 1926.102 · Eye and face protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1)

(a) General. (1) The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)

(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.

Other roofing contractors employers in New Jersey

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in New Jersey the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.