OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Anibal Rodriguez: OSHA inspections and violations

Methuen, Massachusetts · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160

1inspections
3citation items
$4,688current penalties
Aug 10, 2023last inspection

OSHA has inspected Anibal Rodriguez once in Massachusetts.

The inspection began on Aug 10, 2023 on a referral, in Methuen.

That inspection ended with 3 citation items: 3 serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $4,688 and still stand at $4,688.

Fall protection systems comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 1926.502.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and Anibal Rodriguez averages $4,688 (1 cited inspection).

Anibal Rodriguez: OSHA citation items per year, 2023 to 2023
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Anibal Rodriguez again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 346900418 OPENED AUG 10, 2023Closed

Referral · Partial · Safety · 2 employees at the site · Closed Jul 8, 2026

44 Oakland Ave, Methuen, MA 01844 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
 Serious$4,688$4,688Oct 19, 2023Final
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1926.502(d) · Fall protection systems
 Serious$0$0Oct 19, 2023Final
Citation 1, item 1c
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15) · Fall protection systems
 Serious$0$0Oct 19, 2023Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)

(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.

29 CFR 1926.502 · Fall protection systems

29 CFR 1926.502(d)

(d) Personal fall arrest systems. Personal fall arrest systems and their use shall comply with the provisions set forth below. Effective January 1, 1998, body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. Note: The use of a body belt in a positioning device system is acceptable and is regulated under paragraph (e) of this section.

29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15)

(15) Anchorages used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment shall be independent of any anchorage being used to support or suspend platforms and capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached, or shall be designed, installed, and used as follows:

Other roofing contractors employers in Massachusetts

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.