East Lyme, Connecticut · Framing Contractors · NAICS 238130
Apm Builders, LLC has 4 OSHA inspections on record in Connecticut, the first in 2009.
OSHA's last visit started on Aug 14, 2017 as a planned inspection, in Litchfield.
Across those inspections OSHA issued 7 citation items: 7 serious.
OSHA proposed $10,130 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $9,530, down 6%.
Most often, OSHA cited 1926.451, scaffolds, general requirements (3 items).
For context, across all construction employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,080. Apm Builders, LLC averages $1,515 over 2 cited inspections in that time.
Want to know if OSHA cites Apm Builders, LLC again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this companyDowling Toyota, Route 202, Litchfield, CT 06759 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.100(a) · Hard hats in construction |
Serious | $1,630 | $1,630 | Sep 22, 2017 | Final |
26 Waterbury Rd., Prospect, CT 06712 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii) · Scaffolds, general requirements |
Serious | $2,000 | $1,400 | Mar 2, 2016 | Final |
914-928 Hopmeadow Street, Simsbury, CT 06070 · Finish Carpentry Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii) · Scaffolds, general requirements |
Serious | $2,000 | $2,000 | Apr 7, 2010 | Closed |
15 Chesterfield Road, East Lyme, CT 06333 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1a 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $1,500 | $1,500 | Jun 1, 2009 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 1b 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(3) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Jun 1, 2009 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(iv) · Scaffolds, general requirements |
Serious | $1,500 | $1,500 | Jun 1, 2009 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction |
Serious | $1,500 | $1,500 | Jun 1, 2009 | Closed |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.100(a)
(a) Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets.
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)
(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(iv)
(iv) Front-end loaders and similar pieces of equipment shall not be used to support scaffold platforms unless they have been specifically designed by the manufacturer for such use.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.