Sault Sainte Marie, Michigan · Framing Contractors · NAICS 238130
OSHA has inspected Arbic Construction Inc 3 times in Michigan since 2007.
The latest one began on Jun 24, 2021 after a complaint, in Sault Sainte Marie.
Those inspections ended with 5 citation items: 5 serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $1,350 and now stand at $870, 36% lower after settlements or reviews.
Lead in construction comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 1926.62.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and Arbic Construction Inc averages $400 (1 cited inspection).
Want to know if OSHA cites Arbic Construction Inc again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company1416 West Easterday Avenue, Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1a 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(i) · Lead in construction |
Serious | $400 | $400 | Sep 28, 2021 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 1b 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v) · Lead in construction |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Sep 28, 2021 | Final |
3522 I-75 Business Loop, Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 408.40622(1) |
Serious | $400 | $160 | Feb 5, 2015 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 408.41960(1) |
Serious | $400 | $160 | Feb 5, 2015 | Final |
13196 E Partridge Dr, Brimley, MI 49715 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $150 | $150 | Jan 9, 2008 | Closed |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)
(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(i)
(d) Exposure assessment—(1) General. (i) Each employer who has a workplace or operation covered by this standard shall initially determine if any employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level.
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)
(v) Until the employer performs an employee exposure assessment as required under paragraph (d) of this section and determines actual employee exposure, the employer shall provide to employees performing the tasks described in paragraphs (d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) of this section with interim protection as follows:
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.