Corpus Christi, Texas · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160
OSHA has inspected Armando Martinez 6 times in Texas since 1995.
The latest one began on Jul 12, 2017 as part of a related case, in Mcallen.
Those inspections ended with 8 citation items: 6 serious, 1 repeat and 1 other-than-serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $13,227 and now stand at $8,080, 39% lower after settlements or reviews.
Fall protection in construction comes up most often in these citations: 5 items under 1926.501.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,079, and Armando Martinez averages $1,550 (2 cited inspections).
Want to know if OSHA cites Armando Martinez again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company3500 North Mccoll Road, Mcallen, TX 78501 · Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment (except Automotive and Electronic) Repair and Maintenance · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
South Padre Island And Nile Rd, Corpus Christi, TX 78418 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Repeat | $2,933 | $1,700 | Feb 9, 2017 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2) · Fall protection training in construction |
Other-than-serious | $274 | $200 | Feb 9, 2017 | Final |
Sw Corner Ocean Dr And Ennis Joslin Rd, Corpus Christi, TX 78412 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $2,400 | $1,200 | May 26, 2016 | Final |
103 Harwood, Bedford, TX 76021 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $1,700 | $1,700 | Jun 26, 2013 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction |
Serious | $1,020 | $1,020 | Jun 26, 2013 | Final |
2270 Wakefield, Allen, TX 75013 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $2,800 | $1,000 | Dec 19, 2012 | Final |
5711 Preston Oaks, Dallas,, TX 75204 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $1,050 | $630 | May 11, 1995 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1) · Fall protection training in construction |
Serious | $1,050 | $630 | May 11, 1995 | Closed |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)
(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1)
(b)(1) Unprotected sides and edges. Each employee on a walking/working surface (horizontal and vertical surface) with an unprotected side or edge which is 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level shall be protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11)
(11) Steep roofs. Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.