Inspection 348951070 OPENED MAY 21, 2026Closed
1746 Dumas St, Montgomery, TX 77316 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
The Woodlands, Texas · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160
OSHA has inspected Armando Perez 6 times in Texas since 2008.
The latest one began on May 21, 2026 to follow up on an earlier case, in Montgomery.
Those inspections ended with 9 citation items: 6 serious and 3 repeat.
Penalties were first proposed at $39,188 and now stand at $35,227, 10% lower after settlements or reviews.
Fall protection in construction comes up most often in these citations: 5 items under 1926.501.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,079, and Armando Perez averages $12,563 (2 cited inspections).
Want to know if OSHA cites Armando Perez again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company1746 Dumas St, Montgomery, TX 77316 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
1746 Dumas St, Montgomery, TX 77316 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) · Eye and face protection in construction |
Repeat | $9,930 | $9,930 | Feb 13, 2026 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Repeat | $9,930 | $9,930 | Feb 13, 2026 | Final |
5326 Cherry Spring Dr., The Woodlands, TX 77386 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) · Eye and face protection in construction |
Serious | $2,926 | $1,756 | Jan 14, 2022 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $2,926 | $1,756 | Jan 14, 2022 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction |
Serious | $2,926 | $1,756 | Jan 14, 2022 | Final |
19007 Sweden Court Senterra Lakes Subdivision, Spring, TX 77379 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Repeat | $4,400 | $4,400 | Feb 26, 2013 | Final |
27 Aventuran Pl, The Woodlands, TX 77389 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $4,200 | $4,200 | Jan 13, 2012 | Closed |
Exchange Pkwy At Central Expressway, Allen, TX 75002 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.100(a) · Hard hats in construction |
Serious | $450 | $750 | May 20, 2008 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $1,500 | $750 | May 20, 2008 | Closed |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.100(a)
(a) Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets.
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1)
(a) General. (1) The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)
(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.