OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Atomic Container Homes: OSHA inspections and violations

El Paso, Texas · Other Metal Container Manufacturing · NAICS 332439

1inspections
2citation items
$2,579current penalties
Aug 2, 2017last inspection

OSHA has inspected Atomic Container Homes once in Texas.

The inspection began on Aug 2, 2017 after a complaint, in El Paso.

That inspection ended with 2 citation items: 1 serious and 1 other-than-serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $2,579 and still stand at $2,579.

Respiratory protection comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 1910.134.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for manufacturing employers since 2015 is $3,600, and Atomic Container Homes averages $2,579 (1 cited inspection).

Atomic Container Homes: OSHA citation items per year, 2017 to 2017
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Atomic Container Homes again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 342516135 OPENED AUG 2, 2017Closed

Complaint · Partial · Health · 7 employees at the site · Closed Sep 8, 2022

1575 E. San Antonio St, El Paso, TX 79901 · Other Metal Container Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1) · Respiratory protection
Serious$2,173$2,173Dec 18, 2017Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1)(i) · Respiratory protection
Other-than-serious$406$406Dec 18, 2017Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.134 · Respiratory protection

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)

(1) The test instrument must have an effective audio-warning device, or a visual-warning device in the form of a screen tracing, that indicates when the test subject fails to hold his or her breath during the test. The test must be terminated and restarted from the beginning when the test subject fails to hold his or her breath during the test. The test subject then may be refitted and retested.

29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1)(i)

(i) Why the respirator is necessary and how improper fit, usage, or maintenance can compromise the protective effect of the respirator;

Other other metal container manufacturing employers in Texas

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.