OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Bae Systems: OSHA inspections and violations

Fort Riley, Kansas · Military Armored Vehicle, Tank, and Tank Component Manufacturing · NAICS 336992

1inspections
1citation items
$2,750current penalties
Nov 21, 2016last inspection

Bae Systems has one OSHA inspection on record in Kansas.

OSHA opened it on Nov 21, 2016 on a referral, in Fort Riley.

From that inspection OSHA issued 1 citation item: 1 other-than-serious.

OSHA proposed $5,867 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $2,750, down 53%.

For context, across all manufacturing employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,600. Bae Systems averages $2,750 over 1 cited inspection in that time.

It reported 1 severe injury to OSHA since 2015.

Bae Systems: OSHA citation items per year, 2016 to 2016
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Bae Systems again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 341925212 OPENED NOV 21, 2016Closed

Referral · Partial · Safety · 195 employees at the site · Closed Aug 22, 2017

12th Street, Bldg 1671, Fort Riley, KS 66442 · Military Armored Vehicle, Tank, and Tank Component Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii) · Machine guarding
Other-than-serious$5,867$2,750Apr 25, 2017Final

Severe injury reports

Employers must report any work-related amputation, in-patient hospitalization or loss of an eye to OSHA within 24 hours. 1 report on file.

Nov 10, 2016, Fort Riley: Hospitalization · fractures · arm(s), unspecified

An employee's sleeve became caught and tangled in a 3-inch magnet drill's bit, breaking the left arm in two places.

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.212 · Machine guarding

29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii)

(ii) The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, shall be guarded. The guarding device shall be in conformity with any appropriate standards therefor, or, in the absence of applicable specific standards, shall be so designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle.

Other military armored vehicle, tank, and tank component manufacturing employers in Kansas

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.