West New York, New Jersey · Masonry Contractors · NAICS 238140
OSHA has inspected Benitez Construction 5 times in New Jersey since 2012.
The latest one began on Jan 3, 2025 after a complaint, in Livingston; the case is still open.
Those inspections ended with 16 citation items: 15 serious and 1 repeat.
Penalties were first proposed at $41,523 and now stand at $24,991, 40% lower after settlements or reviews.
Scaffolds, general requirements comes up most often in these citations: 4 items under 1926.451.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and Benitez Construction averages $5,873 (4 cited inspections).
New Jersey · latest 90 days of OSHA records
270employers cited
10 of them in the same industry
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in New Jersey: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
See who gets cited nextLatest cited in New Jersey
Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Benitez Construction and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.
Watch this company136 Passaic Ave., Livingston, NJ 07039 · Masonry Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(14) · Fall protection in construction |
Repeat | $9,930 | $9,930 | Jul 3, 2025 | Final |
199 Texas Road, Old Bridge, NJ 08857 · Masonry Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $1,865 | $1,865 | Jun 22, 2022 | Final |
37 Banks Street, Netcong, NJ 07857 · Masonry Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15) · Fall protection systems |
Serious | $3,856 | $3,000 | Jul 21, 2020 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2a 29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1) · Silica dust in construction |
Serious | $3,856 | $3,000 | Jul 21, 2020 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2b 29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i) · Silica dust in construction |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Jul 21, 2020 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 3a 29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(1) · Silica dust in construction |
Serious | $3,856 | $2,000 | Jul 21, 2020 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 3b 29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(4) · Silica dust in construction |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Jul 21, 2020 | Final |
135 Brick Boulevard Building 2 Elevator Shaft, Brick, NJ 08723 · Masonry Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7) · Scaffolds, general requirements |
Serious | $3,080 | $1,848 | Jul 1, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2a 29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii) · Scaffolds, general requirements |
Serious | $3,080 | $1,848 | Jul 1, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2b 29 CFR 1926.451(g)(2) · Scaffolds, general requirements |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Jul 1, 2016 | Final |
5518-5524 Gaw Place, West New York, NJ 07093 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1a 29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(iie) · Job-site wiring |
Serious | $3,000 | $300 | Feb 2, 2012 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 1b 29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(iif) · Job-site wiring |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Feb 2, 2012 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 1c 29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(iii) · Job-site wiring |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Feb 2, 2012 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1) · Scaffolds, general requirements |
Serious | $3,600 | $400 | Feb 2, 2012 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1926.452(c)(2) · Rules for each type of scaffold |
Serious | $2,400 | $400 | Feb 2, 2012 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 4 29 CFR 1926.701(b) · Concrete and Masonry Construction: general requirements |
Serious | $3,000 | $400 | Feb 2, 2012 | Closed |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1)
(c) Specified exposure control methods. (1) For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer shall fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.
29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i)
(2) Exposure assessment—(i) General. The employer shall assess the exposure of each employee who is or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section.
29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(1)
(g) Written exposure control plan. (1) The employer shall establish and implement a written exposure control plan that contains at least the following elements:
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in New Jersey the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.