BRR Construction LLC has 4 OSHA inspections on record in Minnesota, the first in 2014.
OSHA's last visit started on Feb 16, 2018 as a planned inspection, in Rochester, and the case has not closed yet.
Across those inspections OSHA issued 7 citation items: 3 serious and 4 repeat.
OSHA proposed $10,250 in penalties and the amount has not been reduced.
Most often, OSHA cited 1926.501, fall protection in construction (7 items).
For context, across all construction employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,080. BRR Construction LLC averages $3,192 over 3 cited inspections in that time.
Minnesota · latest 90 days of OSHA records
381employers cited
33 of them in the same industry
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Minnesota: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
See who gets cited nextLatest cited in Minnesota
Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch BRR Construction LLC and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.
Watch this company191 Sandbar Court, Rochester, MN 55906 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1a 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11) · Fall protection in construction |
Repeat | $6,875 | $6,875 | Feb 26, 2018 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 1b 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Repeat | $0 | $0 | Feb 26, 2018 | Final |
901 16th Ave Ne, Austin, MN 55912 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1a 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10) · Fall protection in construction |
Repeat | $1,875 | $1,875 | Feb 26, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 1b 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Repeat | $0 | $0 | Feb 26, 2016 | Final |
4334 Garden Court Se, Rochester, MN 55904 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1a 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $825 | $825 | Sep 18, 2015 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 1b 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Sep 18, 2015 | Closed |
1244 Canterbury Rd S, Shakopee, MN 55379 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $675 | $675 | Jul 30, 2014 | Closed |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10)
(10) Roofing work on Low-slope roofs. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width (see appendix A to subpart M of this part), the use of a safety monitoring system alone [i.e. without the warning line system] is permitted.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11)
(11) Steep roofs. Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)
(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Minnesota the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.