OSHA has inspected Building Solutions, LLC 4 times in Arizona since 2005.
The latest one began on May 4, 2021 as part of a related case, in Tucson.
Those inspections ended with 3 citation items: 1 serious and 2 other-than-serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $7,000 and now stand at $3,500, 50% lower after settlements or reviews.
Hazard communication comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 1910.1200.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and Building Solutions, LLC averages $0 (1 cited inspection).
1 inspection on this page followed a fatal incident.
Arizona · latest 90 days of OSHA records
91employers cited
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Arizona: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
See who gets cited nextLatest cited in Arizona
Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Building Solutions, LLC and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.
Watch this company3550 E Corona Rd, Tucson, AZ 85701 · Poured Concrete Foundation and Structure Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1) · Hazard communication |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Sep 20, 2021 | Final |
1900 E Speedway Blvd, Tucson, AZ 85719 · All Other Specialty Trade Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
1833 W Southern Ave Bldg #15, Mesa, AZ 85210 · All Other Specialty Trade Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
1833 W Southern Ave Bldg #15, Mesa, AZ 85210 · Other Services to Buildings and Dwellings · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
Incident on Jun 29, 2005 (fatal): Employee is killed in explosion of drum with chemicals
At approximately 1:30 p.m. on June 29, 2005, Employee #1, 39-year old worker, wa s cutting the top off of an empty 55-gallon drum that contained a Styrene monome r. Employee #1 was using a Bosch handheld radial saw equipped with a metal blade . Employee #1 was working on the last empty drum. It appears that the bungs were not removed, and therefore the drum was not rinsed. Employee #1 laid the drum d own on its side and was cutting the bottom off of the drum, when it exploded. Th e drum caught on fire, blowing the bottom off of the drum and sending it flying against the wall. Employee #1 was burned over 80 percent of his body and died on July 5, 2005. The previous empty drums that Employee #1 cut through had the bun gs removed. There were three other flammable resin UN 1866 drums that he cut the tops off of successfully. These drums were marked as Xylene.
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1910.1200(h) · Hazard communication |
Serious | $7,000 | $3,500 | Oct 4, 2005 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1) · Respiratory protection |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Oct 4, 2005 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)
(e) Written hazard communication program. (1) Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)
(h) Post-mortem data: Increased incidence and/or severity of post-mortem findings may be indicative of maternal toxicity. This can include gross or microscopic pathological findings or organ weight data, including absolute organ weight, organ-to-body weight ratio, or organ-to-brain weight ratio. When supported by findings of adverse histopathological effects in the affected organ(s), the observation of a significant change in the average weight of suspected target organ(s) of treated dams (mothers), compared to those in the control group, may be considered evidence of maternal toxicity.
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)
(1) The test instrument must have an effective audio-warning device, or a visual-warning device in the form of a screen tracing, that indicates when the test subject fails to hold his or her breath during the test. The test must be terminated and restarted from the beginning when the test subject fails to hold his or her breath during the test. The test subject then may be refitted and retested.
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Arizona the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.