OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Burgerbusters Inc.: OSHA inspections and violations

Hagerstown, Maryland · Limited-Service Restaurants · NAICS 722513

1inspections
5citation items
$2,330current penalties
Mar 12, 2020last inspection

Burgerbusters Inc. has one OSHA inspection on record in Maryland.

OSHA opened it on Mar 12, 2020 after an accident, in Hagerstown.

From that inspection OSHA issued 5 citation items: 3 serious and 2 other-than-serious.

OSHA proposed $3,700 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $2,330, down 37%.

Most often, OSHA cited 1910.132, personal protective equipment, general requirements (2 items).

For context, across all hotel and restaurant employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $1,350. Burgerbusters Inc. averages $2,330 over 1 cited inspection in that time.

Burgerbusters Inc.: OSHA citation items per year, 2020 to 2020
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Burgerbusters Inc. again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 344692942 OPENED MAR 12, 2020Closed

Accident · Partial · Safety · 27 employees at the site · Closed Jul 1, 2020

1600 Wesel Blvd., Hagerstown, MD 21740 · Limited-Service Restaurants · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Incident on Mar 10, 2020: Employee's hand is injured by pressure washer hose

At 10:30 p.m. on March 10, 2020, an employee was operating a Greenworks 2,000-psi electric pressure washer. The employee was pressure washing the inside lobby area of the restaurant and dining area. The employee was using water mixed with Q5R Heavy Duty Degreaser. The hose of this pressure washer was 8-feet in length and was pressurized to approximately 2,000-psi. It was determined through interviews and after reviewing the security footage that the employee was trying to un-kink the high-pressure hose. The employee stated that the hose kept kinking up on him, causing the pressure washer to cut off and lose pressure. The employee stated that he reached with his left hand to grab the high-pressure hose. When attempting to un-kink the high-pressure hose, the hose had busted in his hand. The employee sustained a laceration on his left hand, in the webbing in between his left middle and index finger. The penetrating water had penetrated to his upper palm and almost to his wrist. The employee also sustained nerve damage and contusions. The employee was hospitalized.

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1) · Personal protective equipment, general requirements
Serious$3,700$2,330Jun 4, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1) · Eye and face protection
Serious$0$0Jun 4, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 1c
29 CFR 1910.138(a) · Gloves and hand protection
Serious$0$0Jun 4, 2020Final
Citation 2, item 2
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2) · Reporting deaths and severe injuries
Other-than-serious$0$0Jun 4, 2020Final
Citation 2, item 3
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2) · Personal protective equipment, general requirements
Other-than-serious$0$0Jun 4, 2020Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1904.39 · Reporting deaths and severe injuries

29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2)

(2) Within twenty-four (24) hours after the in-patient hospitalization of one or more employees or an employee's amputation or an employee's loss of an eye, as a result of a work-related incident, you must report the in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye to OSHA.

29 CFR 1910.132 · Personal protective equipment, general requirements

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1)

(d) Hazard assessment and equipment selection. (1) The employer shall assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). If such hazards are present, or likely to be present, the employer shall:

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2)

(2) The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment.

29 CFR 1910.133 · Eye and face protection

29 CFR 1910.138 · Gloves and hand protection

Other limited-service restaurants employers in Maryland

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.