Rapid City, South Dakota · Farm Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing · NAICS 333111
C-Lock, Inc. has one OSHA inspection on record in South Dakota.
OSHA opened it on Dec 17, 2018 after a complaint, in Rapid City.
From that inspection OSHA issued 2 citation items: 2 other-than-serious.
OSHA proposed $9,016 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $5,000, down 45%.
For context, across all manufacturing employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,600. C-Lock, Inc. averages $5,000 over 1 cited inspection in that time.
C-Lock, Inc. also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.
Want to know if OSHA cites C-Lock, Inc. again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company1350 Concourse Drive, Rapid City, SD 57703 · Farm Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1a 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1) · Respiratory protection |
Other-than-serious | $4,508 | $2,500 | Mar 4, 2019 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1) · Hazard communication |
Other-than-serious | $4,508 | $2,500 | Mar 4, 2019 | Final |
From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.
In 2025, the Rapid City site logged 0 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 23 workers: 0.0 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 2.7 for its industry.
| Site and year | Workers | Cases | Days-away cases | Rate | Industry median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C-Lock Inc Rapid City · 2025 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 2.7 |
| C-Lock Inc. Rapid City · 2025 | 45 | 2 | 0 | 4.3 | 2.7 |
| C-Lock Rapid City · 2021 | 46 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 2.7 |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)
(e) Written hazard communication program. (1) Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)
(1) The test instrument must have an effective audio-warning device, or a visual-warning device in the form of a screen tracing, that indicates when the test subject fails to hold his or her breath during the test. The test must be terminated and restarted from the beginning when the test subject fails to hold his or her breath during the test. The test subject then may be refitted and retested.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.