Spiritwood, North Dakota · Malt Manufacturing · NAICS 311213
OSHA has inspected Cargill Malt 3 times in North Dakota since 2007.
The latest one began on May 1, 2015 on a referral, in Spiritwood.
Those inspections ended with 2 citation items: 1 serious and 1 other-than-serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $7,000 and now stand at $3,500, 50% lower after settlements or reviews.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for manufacturing employers since 2015 is $4,872, and Cargill Malt averages $3,500 (1 cited inspection).
It reported 1 severe injury to OSHA since 2015.
Want to know if OSHA cites Cargill Malt again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company3349 94th Avenue Se, Spiritwood, ND 58481 · Malt Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $7,000 | $3,500 | Jun 25, 2015 | Final |
3349 94th Avenue Se, Spiritwood, ND 58481 · Malt Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i) · Lockout/tagout |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Mar 9, 2009 | Closed |
3349 94th Avenue Se, Spiritwood, ND 58481 · Malt Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
Employers must report any work-related amputation, in-patient hospitalization or loss of an eye to OSHA within 24 hours. 1 report on file.
Apr 28, 2015, Spiritwood: Amputation · amputations · fingertip(s)
An employee sustained a right ring fingertip amputation when placing the right hand on the rail of moving equipment.
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i)
(4) Energy control procedure. (i) Procedures shall be developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees are engaged in the activities covered by this section.
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)
(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.