Inspection 340896422 OPENED SEP 2, 2015Closed
5245 Ne Elam Young Pkwy Ste A, Hillsboro, OR 97124 · Industrial Machinery and Equipment Merchant Wholesalers · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
OSHA has inspected Cascade Technical Sciences Inc 2 times in Oregon since 2015.
The latest one began on Sep 2, 2015 to monitor an earlier case, in Hillsboro.
Those inspections ended with 5 citation items: 3 serious and 2 other-than-serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $240 and still stand at $240.
Respiratory protection comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 1910.134.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for professional services employers since 2015 is $1,821, and Cascade Technical Sciences Inc averages $240 (1 cited inspection).
Want to know if OSHA cites Cascade Technical Sciences Inc again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this companyInspection history
Inspection 340579051 OPENED MAR 9, 2015Closed
5245 Ne Elam Young Pkwy Ste A, Hillsboro, OR 97124 · Testing Laboratories and Services · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR OAR 437-001-0760(1)(B)(C) |
Serious | $120 | $120 | Apr 14, 2015 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2a 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1) · Respiratory protection |
Serious | $120 | $120 | Apr 14, 2015 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2b 29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1) · Respiratory protection |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Apr 14, 2015 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 3 29 CFR OAR 437-001-0765(5)-3 |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Apr 14, 2015 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 4 29 CFR OAR 437-001-0765(7)-3 |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Apr 14, 2015 | Final |
The rules behind these citations
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.134 · Respiratory protection
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)
(1) The test instrument must have an effective audio-warning device, or a visual-warning device in the form of a screen tracing, that indicates when the test subject fails to hold his or her breath during the test. The test must be terminated and restarted from the beginning when the test subject fails to hold his or her breath during the test. The test subject then may be refitted and retested.
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1)
(1) General. The employer shall provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace. The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.
Other testing laboratories and services employers in Oregon
- Acs Testing Inc Tigard · 1 citation · $0
- Oregon Ballistic Laboratories LLC Salem · 34 citations · $4,540
- Dragonfly Landscape & Design Inc Medford · 1 citation · $2,186
- Roush Industries Inc Portland · 6 citations · $980
- Decavo LLC Hood River · 11 citations · $250
- K&D Laboratories Inc Lake Oswego · 3 citations · $2,354
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.