OSHA has inspected Ceiling Specialties Inc 3 times in Oregon since 2002.
The latest one began on Sep 11, 2015 as a planned inspection, in Medford.
Those inspections ended with 6 citation items: 4 serious and 2 other-than-serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $855 and still stand at $855.
Rules for each type of scaffold comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 1926.452.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and Ceiling Specialties Inc averages $730 (1 cited inspection).
Oregon · latest 90 days of OSHA records
384employers cited
4 of them in the same industry
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Oregon: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
See who gets cited nextLatest cited in Oregon
Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Ceiling Specialties Inc and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.
Watch this company2798 E Barnett Rd, Medford, OR 97504 · Drywall and Insulation Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii) · Scaffolds, general requirements |
Serious | $630 | $630 | Oct 15, 2015 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR OAR 437-003-0503(1)(B)(B) |
Serious | $100 | $100 | Oct 15, 2015 | Final |
965 Ellendale Dr, Medford, OR 97504 · Drywall and Insulation Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 | Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Aug 24, 2004 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.103(c)(2)(i) · Respiratory protection |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Aug 24, 2004 | Closed |
1600 N Riverside, Medford, OR 97501 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1a 29 CFR 1926.452(w)(2) · Rules for each type of scaffold |
Serious | $125 | $125 | May 6, 2002 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 1b 29 CFR 1926.452(w)(6)(ii) · Rules for each type of scaffold |
Serious | $0 | $0 | May 6, 2002 | Closed |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii)
(vii) For all scaffolds not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, each employee shall be protected by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.
29 CFR 1926.452(w)(2)
(2) Scaffold casters and wheels shall be locked with positive wheel and/or wheel and swivel locks, or equivalent means, to prevent movement of the scaffold while the scaffold is used in a stationary manner.
29 CFR 1926.452(w)(6)(ii)
(ii) The height to base width ratio of the scaffold during movement is two to one or less, unless the scaffold is designed and constructed to meet or exceed nationally recognized stability test requirements such as those listed in paragraph 2.(w) of appendix A to this subpart;
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Oregon the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.