Inspection 341787653 OPENED SEP 21, 2016Closed
859 Route 212, Saugerties, NY 12477 · Fire Protection · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
Saugerties, New York · Fire Protection · NAICS 922160
Centerville FD has 4 OSHA inspections on record in New York, the first in 2016.
OSHA's last visit started on Sep 21, 2016 to follow up on an earlier case, in Saugerties.
Across those inspections OSHA issued 7 citation items: 6 serious and 1 other-than-serious.
OSHA did not attach a penalty to any of these citations.
Most often, OSHA cited 1910.134, respiratory protection (4 items).
For context, across all public administration employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $0. Centerville FD averages $0 over 2 cited inspections in that time.
2 inspections on this page followed a fatal incident.
Want to know if OSHA cites Centerville FD again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company859 Route 212, Saugerties, NY 12477 · Fire Protection · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
859 Route 212, Saugerties, NY 12477 · Fire Protection · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
859 Route 212, Saugerties, NY 12477 · Fire Protection · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
Incident on Dec 19, 2015 (fatal): Employee is overcome and is killed by smoke inhalation
At 9:43 p.m. on December 19, 2015, an employee was the second man on a fire hose aimed into a burning basement in order to extinguish a chimney fire. His coworker, the nozzle man, looked back and called out the employees name and realized that the employee was no longer on the line. The employee was killed due to asphyxiation caused by superheated combustible products. See Report 82509.
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.134(g)(3)(ii) · Respiratory protection |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Jun 1, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1910.134(g)(4)(i) · Respiratory protection |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Jun 1, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1910.134(h)(3)(iii) · Respiratory protection |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Jun 1, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 4 29 CFR 1910.134(k)(5) · Respiratory protection |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Jun 1, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 12 NYCRR PART 801.33(A) |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Jun 1, 2016 | Final |
11 Fel Qui Rd, Woodstock, NY 12498 · Fire Protection · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
Incident on Dec 19, 2015 (fatal): Employee is killed during basement fire
At 9:43 p.m. on December 19, 2015, an employee was the second man on a fire hose that was aimed into a burning basement in order to extinguish a fire. His coworker, the nozzle man, looked back and called out the employee's name and saw that the employee was no longer on the line. The employee was killed due to asphyxiation caused by superheated combustible products.
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.156(b)(1) · Fire brigades |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Jun 1, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1910.156(c)(2) · Fire brigades |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Jun 1, 2016 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(3)(ii)
(ii) Visual, voice, or signal line communication is maintained between the employee(s) in the IDLH atmosphere and the employee(s) located outside the IDLH atmosphere;
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(4)(i)
(i) At least two employees enter the IDLH atmosphere and remain in visual or voice contact with one another at all times;
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(3)(iii)
(h) Maintenance and care of respirators. This paragraph requires the employer to provide for the cleaning and disinfecting, storage, inspection, and repair of respirators used by employees.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.