Saint Louis, Missouri · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160
OSHA inspectors have visited Cesar Pinoth in Missouri one time.
It opened on Jan 10, 2017 as a planned inspection, in Saint Louis.
In all, OSHA issued 2 citation items: 2 serious.
The proposed penalties came to $4,618; today they stand at $2,000, 57% less.
Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,078 penalty. Cesar Pinoth averages $2,000 across 1 cited inspection.
Want to know if OSHA cites Cesar Pinoth again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company5795 Degiverville Ave, Saint Louis, MO 63112 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $2,309 | $1,000 | Jan 24, 2017 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction |
Serious | $2,309 | $1,000 | Jan 24, 2017 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)
(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)
(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.