OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

CK Technologies, LLC: OSHA inspections and violations

Montpelier, Ohio · All Other Plastics Product Manufacturing · NAICS 326199

2inspections
7citation items
$13,132current penalties
Mar 7, 2019last inspection

Since 2004, OSHA inspectors have visited CK Technologies, LLC in Ohio 2 times.

The most recent inspection opened on Mar 7, 2019 after a complaint, in Montpelier.

In all, OSHA issued 7 citation items: 7 serious.

The proposed penalties came to $17,110; today they stand at $13,132, 23% less.

The rule cited most here is 1910.147 (lockout/tagout), 5 times.

Among manufacturing employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $4,500 penalty. CK Technologies, LLC averages $9,282 across 1 cited inspection.

CK Technologies, LLC also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.

CK Technologies, LLC: OSHA citation items per year, 2004 to 2019
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites CK Technologies, LLC again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 343834305 OPENED MAR 7, 2019Closed

Complaint · Partial · Safety · 390 employees at the site · Closed May 23, 2019

1701 Magda Drive, Montpelier, OH 43543 · All Other Plastics Product Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i) · Fall protection in general industry
Serious$13,260$9,282Apr 9, 2019Final
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1910.30(a)(1) · Training requirements
Serious$0$0Apr 9, 2019Final

Inspection 307232314 OPENED APR 28, 2004Closed

Complaint · Partial · Safety · 122 employees at the site · Closed Sep 9, 2004

1701 Magda Dr., Montpelier, OH 43543 · All Other Plastics Product Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i) · Lockout/tagout
Serious$963$963Jul 15, 2004Closed
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(iib) · Lockout/tagout
Serious$0$0Jul 15, 2004Closed
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i) · Lockout/tagout
Serious$963$963Jul 15, 2004Closed
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(3) · Lockout/tagout
Serious$963$963Jul 15, 2004Closed
Citation 1, item 4
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i) · Lockout/tagout
Serious$961$961Jul 15, 2004Closed

Injury and illness logs

From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.

In 2021, the Montpelier site logged 4 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 430 workers: 0.9 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 2.6 for its industry. Those cases cost 27 days away from work.

Site and yearWorkersCasesDays-away casesRateIndustry median
CK Technologies
Montpelier · 2021
430 420.92.6

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.147 · Lockout/tagout

29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(iib)

(B) Specific procedural steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy;

29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i)

(6) Periodic inspection. (i) The employer shall conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirements of this standard are being followed.

29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)

(7) Training and communication. (i) The employer shall provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees. The training shall include the following:

29 CFR 1910.28 · Fall protection in general industry

29 CFR 1910.30 · Training requirements

Other all other plastics product manufacturing employers in Ohio

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.