OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Claudio Velis: OSHA inspections and violations

Alpharetta, Georgia · Framing Contractors · NAICS 238130

3inspections
6citation items
$20,793current penalties
Sep 14, 2016last inspection

OSHA has inspected Claudio Velis 3 times in Georgia since 2015.

The latest one began on Sep 14, 2016 as a planned inspection, in Alpharetta.

Those inspections ended with 6 citation items: 4 serious and 2 repeat.

Penalties were first proposed at $26,491 and now stand at $20,793, 22% lower after settlements or reviews.

Fall protection in construction comes up most often in these citations: 3 items under 1926.501.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and Claudio Velis averages $6,931 (3 cited inspections).

Claudio Velis: OSHA citation items per year, 2015 to 2016
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Georgia · latest 90 days of OSHA records

136employers cited

27 of them in the same industry

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Georgia: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in Georgia

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Claudio Velis and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 341773927 OPENED SEP 14, 2016Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 9 employees at the site · Closed May 1, 2018

4630 Gosling Dr., Alpharetta, GA 30004 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Repeat$8,231$6,173Nov 10, 2016Final

Inspection 341549459 OPENED JUN 13, 2016Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 4 employees at the site · Closed Aug 15, 2016

4745 Flycatcher Dr, Alpharetta, GA 30004 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Repeat$6,160$6,160Jul 29, 2016Final

Inspection 340437987 OPENED MAR 3, 2015Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 6 employees at the site · Closed Oct 28, 2015

1575 Bluestone Dr, Cumming, GA 30040 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) · Eye and face protection in construction
Serious$2,800$1,960Mar 18, 2015Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(i) · Job-site wiring
Serious$1,600$1,120Mar 18, 2015Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$4,900$3,420Mar 18, 2015Final
Citation 1, item 4
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4) · Ladders in construction
Serious$2,800$1,960Mar 18, 2015Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.102 · Eye and face protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1)

(a) General. (1) The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.

29 CFR 1926.1053 · Ladders in construction

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4)

(4) Ladders shall be used only for the purpose for which they were designed.

29 CFR 1926.405 · Job-site wiring

29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(i)

(iii) Guarding. For temporary wiring over 600 volts, nominal, fencing, barriers, or other effective means shall be provided to prevent access of other than authorized and qualified personnel.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

Other framing contractors employers in Georgia

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Georgia the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.