OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Clopez Construction Inc: OSHA inspections and violations

Rosemount, Minnesota · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160

3inspections
7citation items
$15,488current penalties
May 29, 2019last inspection

Since 2016, OSHA inspectors have visited Clopez Construction Inc in Minnesota 3 times.

The most recent inspection opened on May 29, 2019 as a planned inspection, in Ely.

In all, OSHA issued 7 citation items: 6 serious and 1 repeat.

The proposed penalties came to $16,050; today they stand at $15,488, 4% less.

The rule cited most here is 1926.501 (fall protection in construction), 5 times.

Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,080 penalty. Clopez Construction Inc averages $5,162 across 3 cited inspections.

Clopez Construction Inc: OSHA citation items per year, 2016 to 2019
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Minnesota · latest 90 days of OSHA records

381employers cited

33 of them in the same industry

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Minnesota: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in Minnesota

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Clopez Construction Inc and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 344044425 OPENED MAY 29, 2019Closed

Planned · Complete · Safety · 6 employees at the site · Closed May 10, 2023

124 N Central Ave, Ely, MN 55731 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11) · Fall protection in construction
Repeat$12,250$12,250Jun 28, 2019Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 182.653(08)
Serious$350$350Jun 28, 2019Final
Citation 2, item 2
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1) · Electrical safety in construction
Serious$1,575$1,575Jun 28, 2019Final

Inspection 341594315 OPENED JUN 30, 2016Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 6 employees at the site · Closed Aug 15, 2016

4820 Alpha Parkway Nw, Rochester, MN 55901 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$825$578Jul 7, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$0$0Jul 7, 2016Final

Inspection 341529063 OPENED JUN 6, 2016Closed

Planned · Complete · Safety · 6 employees at the site · Closed Jul 14, 2016

15559 Cherry Path, Rosemount, MN 55068 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$1,050$735Jun 23, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$0$0Jun 23, 2016Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.416 · Electrical safety in construction

29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1)

(a) Protection of employees. (1) No employer shall permit an employee to work in such proximity to any part of an electric power circuit that the employee could contact the electric power circuit in the course of work, unless the employee is protected against electric shock by deenergizing the circuit and grounding it or by guarding it effectively by insulation or other means.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11)

(11) Steep roofs. Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)

(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.

Other roofing contractors employers in Minnesota

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Minnesota the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.