Port Saint Lucie, Florida · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160
OSHA has inspected Code Red Roofers, Inc. 6 times in Florida since 2016.
The latest one began on Jul 14, 2025 as a planned inspection, in Port Saint Lucie; the case is still open.
Those inspections ended with 8 citation items: 3 serious, 3 repeat and 2 other-than-serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $153,273 and now stand at $122,344, 20% lower after settlements or reviews.
Fall protection in construction comes up most often in these citations: 5 items under 1926.501.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,078, and Code Red Roofers, Inc. averages $24,469 (5 cited inspections).
Want to know if OSHA cites Code Red Roofers, Inc. again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company1579 Se North Blackwell Dr, Port Saint Lucie, FL 34952 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction |
Serious | $10,214 | $10,214 | Aug 12, 2025 | Contested |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Repeat | $51,068 | $51,068 | Aug 12, 2025 | Contested |
88 Se Hancock Rd Building 8, Stuart, FL 34994 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
5405 Turnpike Feeder Road, Fort Pierce, FL 34951 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10) · Fall protection in construction |
Repeat | $68,449 | $47,904 | Jun 27, 2024 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1) · Fall protection training in construction |
Other-than-serious | $1,281 | $896 | Jun 27, 2024 | Final |
550 Sagamore Drive, Port Saint Lucie, FL 34983 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $8,036 | $4,822 | Aug 3, 2023 | Final |
4609 Sw Cacao St, Port Saint Lucie, FL 34953 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4) · Ladders in construction |
Other-than-serious | $2,956 | $0 | Jan 10, 2020 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Repeat | $8,869 | $6,000 | Jan 10, 2020 | Final |
1097 Sw California Blvd, Port Saint Lucie, FL 34953 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $2,400 | $1,440 | Jul 27, 2016 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)
(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4)
(4) Ladders shall be used only for the purpose for which they were designed.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10)
(10) Roofing work on Low-slope roofs. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width (see appendix A to subpart M of this part), the use of a safety monitoring system alone [i.e. without the warning line system] is permitted.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.