OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Conway Arnold: OSHA inspections and violations

Traverse City, Michigan · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160

1inspections
6citation items
$1,600current penalties
Mar 16, 2017last inspection

OSHA inspectors have visited Conway Arnold in Michigan one time.

It opened on Mar 16, 2017 as a planned inspection, in Traverse City.

In all, OSHA issued 6 citation items: 4 serious and 2 other-than-serious.

The penalties, $1,600 in total, stand where OSHA first set them.

Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,079 penalty. Conway Arnold averages $1,600 across 1 cited inspection.

Conway Arnold: OSHA citation items per year, 2017 to 2017
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Conway Arnold again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 342174810 OPENED MAR 16, 2017Closed

Planned · Complete · Safety · 2 employees at the site · Closed Oct 26, 2018

5111 Stonefield Dr, Traverse City, MI 49684 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 408.41937(4)
 Serious$400$400Apr 7, 2017Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 408.41121(3)
 Serious$400$400Apr 7, 2017Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 408.41124(5)
 Serious$400$400Apr 7, 2017Final
Citation 1, item 4
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
 Serious$400$400Apr 7, 2017Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 408.40114(1)
 Other-than-serious$0$0Apr 7, 2017Final
Citation 2, item 2
29 CFR 408.40132(3)
 Other-than-serious$0$0Apr 7, 2017Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)

(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.

Other roofing contractors employers in Michigan

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.