Circle Pines, Minnesota · Small Arms, Ordnance, and Ordnance Accessories Manufacturing · NAICS 332994
OSHA inspectors have visited Coonan Inc in Minnesota one time.
It opened on Sep 21, 2016 as a planned inspection, in Circle Pines.
In all, OSHA issued 2 citation items: 2 serious.
The proposed penalties came to $525; today they stand at $368, 30% less.
Among manufacturing employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,600 penalty. Coonan Inc averages $368 across 1 cited inspection.
Minnesota · latest 90 days of OSHA records
381employers cited
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Minnesota: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
See who gets cited nextLatest cited in Minnesota
Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Coonan Inc and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.
Watch this company4501 103rd Ct Ne Ste 120, Circle Pines, MN 55014 · Small Arms, Ordnance, and Ordnance Accessories Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $225 | $158 | Oct 11, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) · Hazard communication |
Serious | $300 | $210 | Oct 11, 2016 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1)
(h) Employee information and training. (1) Employers shall provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new chemical hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area. Information and training may be designed to cover categories of hazards (e.g., flammability, carcinogenicity) or specific chemicals. Chemical-specific information must always be available through labels and safety data sheets.
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)
(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Minnesota the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.