Bismarck, North Dakota · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160
Since 1993, OSHA inspectors have visited Custom Roofing, Inc. in North Dakota 5 times.
The most recent inspection opened on Nov 26, 2019 as a planned inspection, in Fargo.
In all, OSHA issued 7 citation items: 4 serious, 1 repeat and 2 other-than-serious.
The penalties, $9,706 in total, stand where OSHA first set them.
The rule cited most here is 1926.501 (fall protection in construction), 3 times.
Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,080 penalty. Custom Roofing, Inc. averages $7,956 across 1 cited inspection.
North Dakota · latest 90 days of OSHA records
31employers cited
10 of them in the same industry
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in North Dakota: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
See who gets cited nextLatest cited in North Dakota
Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Custom Roofing, Inc. and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.
Watch this companyIn Vicinity Of 17th Avenue Sw & 42nd Street Sw, Fargo, ND 58102 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Repeat | $7,956 | $7,956 | Nov 27, 2019 | Final |
1/2 Mile West, Corner Of Washington & Highway 83, Bismarck, ND 58501 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $625 | $625 | Nov 25, 2009 | Closed |
State Capitol Building, Bismarck, ND 58501 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $900 | $900 | Jul 13, 2000 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 2a 29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(12) · Stairways in construction |
Serious | $225 | $225 | Jul 13, 2000 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 2b 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Jul 13, 2000 | Closed |
408 Ninth Nw, Mandan, ND 58554 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
2425 Hillview, Bismarck, ND 58501 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.301(a) · Hand tools |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Feb 9, 1993 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv) · Job-site wiring |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Feb 9, 1993 | Closed |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(12)
(12) Unprotected sides and edges of stairway landings shall be provided with guardrail systems. Guardrail system criteria are contained in subpart M of this part.
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)
(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.
29 CFR 1926.301(a)
(a) Employers shall not issue or permit the use of unsafe hand tools.
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in North Dakota the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.