Kansas City, Missouri · Motor Vehicle Body Manufacturing · NAICS 336211
OSHA has inspected Custom Truck One Source 3 times in Missouri since 2020.
The latest one began on Dec 30, 2024 after a complaint, in Kansas City.
Those inspections ended with 8 citation items: 6 serious and 2 other-than-serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $35,582 and now stand at $21,349, 40% lower after settlements or reviews.
Respiratory protection comes up most often in these citations: 6 items under 1910.134.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for manufacturing employers since 2015 is $3,600, and Custom Truck One Source averages $10,675 (2 cited inspections).
Custom Truck One Source also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.
It reported 1 severe injury to OSHA since 2015.
Want to know if OSHA cites Custom Truck One Source again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company7701 Independence Avenue, Kansas City, MO 64125 · Construction, Mining, and Forestry Machinery and Equipment Rental and Leasing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i) · Respiratory protection |
Other-than-serious | $1,328 | $797 | May 5, 2025 | Final |
7701 Independence Ave., Kansas City, MO 64129 · Motor Vehicle Body Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
7701 Independence Ave., Kansas City, MO 64129 · Motor Vehicle Body Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i) · Fall protection in general industry |
Serious | $9,753 | $5,852 | Apr 16, 2021 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2a 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii) · Respiratory protection |
Serious | $13,653 | $8,192 | Apr 16, 2021 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2b 29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1) · Respiratory protection |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Apr 16, 2021 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2c 29 CFR 1910.134(h)(1) · Respiratory protection |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Apr 16, 2021 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2d 29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i) · Respiratory protection |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Apr 16, 2021 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2) · Electrical equipment, general requirements |
Serious | $9,753 | $5,852 | Apr 16, 2021 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i) · Respiratory protection |
Other-than-serious | $1,095 | $657 | Apr 16, 2021 | Final |
From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.
In 2025, the Kansas City site logged 26 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 1,060 workers: 3.5 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 2.7 for its industry. Those cases cost 576 days away from work.
| Site and year | Workers | Cases | Days-away cases | Rate | Industry median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Custom Truck One Source - Kansas City Kansas City · 2025 | 1,060 | 26 | 12 | 3.5 | 2.7 |
| Kansas City, Missouri Kansas City · 2020 | 750 | 31 | 7 | 4.9 | 5.2 |
Employers must report any work-related amputation, in-patient hospitalization or loss of an eye to OSHA within 24 hours. 1 report on file.
Jun 20, 2025, Kansas City: Amputation · amputations, avulsions, enucleations unspecified · finger or thumb tip(s), nail(s)
Two employees were working together to insert a pin into a hydraulic cylinder. One employee was holding the cylinder in place to align it with the pinhole, while the injured employee was inserting the pin. The injured employee was aligning the pin and moved to determine whether the hole alignment was too high or low. At that moment, the crowbar being used to assist with alignment slipped and his…
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i)
(i) An employer may provide respirators at the request of employees or permit employees to use their own respirators, if the employer determines that such respirator use will not in itself create a hazard. If the employer determines that any voluntary respirator use is permissible, the employer shall provide the respirator users with the information contained in appendix D to this section (“Information for Employees Using Respirators When Not Required Under the Standard”); and
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii)
(ii) In addition, the employer must establish and implement those elements of a written respiratory protection program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily is medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator is cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user. Exception: Employers are not required to include in a written respiratory protection program those employees whose only use of respirators involves the voluntary use of filtering facepieces (dust masks).
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1)
(1) General. The employer shall provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace. The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.