Inspection 341674943 OPENED AUG 3, 2016Closed
1392 Mill Creek Dr., Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
OSHA has inspected D-Wing, Inc. 5 times in Illinois since 2014.
The latest one began on Aug 3, 2016 as a planned inspection, in Buffalo Grove.
Those inspections ended with 7 citation items: 5 serious and 2 repeat.
Penalties were first proposed at $40,380 and now stand at $27,386, 32% lower after settlements or reviews.
Fall protection in construction comes up most often in these citations: 4 items under 1926.501.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,079, and D-Wing, Inc. averages $7,568 (2 cited inspections).
Want to know if OSHA cites D-Wing, Inc. again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company1392 Mill Creek Dr., Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
1212 N. Silver Lake Rd., Arlington Heights, IL 60004 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.100(a) · Hard hats in construction |
Serious | $2,200 | $1,200 | Jul 18, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Repeat | $15,400 | $10,240 | Jul 18, 2016 | Final |
4800 Sauk Trail, Richton Park, IL 60471 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11) · Fall protection in construction |
Repeat | $5,280 | $3,696 | Jan 6, 2016 | Final |
1119 Courtland Pl., Aurora, IL 60502 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $4,900 | $3,430 | Aug 20, 2014 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17) · Fall protection systems |
Serious | $4,200 | $2,940 | Aug 20, 2014 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1) · Fall protection training in construction |
Serious | $3,500 | $2,450 | Aug 20, 2014 | Final |
2487 Legacy Drive, Aurora, IL 60502 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $4,900 | $3,430 | Sep 9, 2014 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.100(a)
(a) Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11)
(11) Steep roofs. Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)
(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.