OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Daem Construction, LLC: OSHA inspections and violations

Saint Augustine, Florida · Framing Contractors · NAICS 238130

4inspections
7citation items
$22,007current penalties
Feb 8, 2023last inspection

OSHA has inspected Daem Construction, LLC 4 times in Florida since 2017.

The latest one began on Feb 8, 2023 as a planned inspection, in Saint Augustine.

Those inspections ended with 7 citation items: 3 serious and 4 repeat.

Penalties were first proposed at $37,457 and now stand at $22,007, 41% lower after settlements or reviews.

Fall protection in construction comes up most often in these citations: 4 items under 1926.501.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,079, and Daem Construction, LLC averages $5,502 (4 cited inspections).

Daem Construction, LLC: OSHA citation items per year, 2017 to 2023
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Daem Construction, LLC again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 346492341 OPENED FEB 8, 2023Closed

Planned · Complete · Safety · 12 employees at the site · Closed Jan 31, 2025

99 Firecrest Drive, Saint Augustine, FL 32092 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Repeat$12,500$6,300Jun 26, 2023Final

Inspection 346488885 OPENED FEB 6, 2023Closed

Planned · Complete · Safety · 8 employees at the site · Closed May 7, 2024

11800 Lem Turner Road, Jacksonville, FL 32218 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) · Eye and face protection in construction
Repeat$4,018$1,992Mar 29, 2023Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Repeat$9,375$6,000Mar 29, 2023Final

Inspection 343503702 OPENED OCT 1, 2018Closed

Referral · Complete · Safety · 8 employees at the site · Closed Aug 18, 2020

216 Anacapa Ct Units No 42, 44, 46 And 48, Saint Augustine, FL 32084 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.100(a) · Hard hats in construction
Serious$1,663$1,164Nov 1, 2018Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) · Eye and face protection in construction
Serious$1,663$1,164Nov 1, 2018Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Repeat$4,435$3,105Nov 1, 2018Final

Inspection 342414786 OPENED JUN 21, 2017Closed

Referral · Complete · Safety · 4 employees at the site · Closed Jul 6, 2017

77 Terrena Loop, Saint Johns, FL 32259 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$3,803$2,282Jun 23, 2017Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.100 · Hard hats in construction

29 CFR 1926.100(a)

(a) Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets.

29 CFR 1926.102 · Eye and face protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1)

(a) General. (1) The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)

(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.

Other framing contractors employers in Florida

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.