OSHA has inspected Dane Purcell 2 times in Nevada since 2020.
The latest one began on Feb 28, 2020, in Reno; the case is still open.
Those inspections ended with 4 citation items: 4 serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $10,412 and still stand at $10,412.
Silica dust in construction comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 1926.1153.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,078, and Dane Purcell averages $5,206 (2 cited inspections).
Want to know if OSHA cites Dane Purcell again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company7001 Rancharrah Parkway, Reno, NV 89509 · Commercial and Institutional Building Construction · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(ii) · Earthmovers and forklifts in construction |
Serious | $2,603 | $2,603 | Jul 1, 2020 | Final |
7001 Rancharrah Parkway, Reno, NV 89519 · Siding Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1) · Respiratory protection |
Serious | $2,603 | $2,603 | Jul 1, 2020 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i) · Silica dust in construction |
Serious | $2,603 | $2,603 | Jul 1, 2020 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(1) · Silica dust in construction |
Serious | $2,603 | $2,603 | Jul 1, 2020 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)
(1) The test instrument must have an effective audio-warning device, or a visual-warning device in the form of a screen tracing, that indicates when the test subject fails to hold his or her breath during the test. The test must be terminated and restarted from the beginning when the test subject fails to hold his or her breath during the test. The test subject then may be refitted and retested.
29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i)
(2) Exposure assessment—(i) General. The employer shall assess the exposure of each employee who is or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section.
29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(1)
(g) Written exposure control plan. (1) The employer shall establish and implement a written exposure control plan that contains at least the following elements:
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.