Dawsonville, Georgia · Siding Contractors · NAICS 238170
OSHA has inspected Daniel Pena 2 times in Georgia since 2025.
The latest one began on Feb 7, 2025 as a planned inspection, in Dawsonville; the case is still open.
Those inspections ended with 4 citation items: 4 serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $8,512 and still stand at $8,512.
Silica dust in construction comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 1926.1153.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,078, and Daniel Pena averages $4,256 (2 cited inspections).
Want to know if OSHA cites Daniel Pena again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company38 Meadow Mark Drive, Dawsonville, GA 30534 · Siding Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) · Eye and face protection in construction |
Serious | $2,128 | $2,128 | Mar 7, 2025 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii) · Scaffolds, general requirements |
Serious | $2,837 | $2,837 | Mar 7, 2025 | Final |
38 Meadow Mark Drive, Dawsonville, GA 30534 · Siding Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1a 29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1) · Silica dust in construction |
Serious | $3,547 | $3,547 | Mar 7, 2025 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 1b 29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i) · Silica dust in construction |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Mar 7, 2025 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1)
(a) General. (1) The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1)
(c) Specified exposure control methods. (1) For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer shall fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.
29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i)
(2) Exposure assessment—(i) General. The employer shall assess the exposure of each employee who is or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.