North Mankato, Minnesota · Welding and Soldering Equipment Manufacturing · NAICS 333992
DF Machine Specialties Inc has 2 OSHA inspections on record in Minnesota, the first in 2015.
OSHA's last visit started on Apr 3, 2019 as a planned inspection, in Mankato.
Across those inspections OSHA issued 4 citation items: 1 serious and 3 other-than-serious.
OSHA proposed $675 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $472, down 30%.
Most often, OSHA cited 1910.1027, cadmium (2 items).
For context, across all manufacturing employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,600. DF Machine Specialties Inc averages $236 over 2 cited inspections in that time.
Minnesota · latest 90 days of OSHA records
381employers cited
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Minnesota: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
See who gets cited nextLatest cited in Minnesota
Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch DF Machine Specialties Inc and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.
Watch this company1750 Howard Dr, Mankato, MN 56003 · Welding and Soldering Equipment Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.1027(d)(1)(i) · Cadmium |
Other-than-serious | $100 | $70 | May 9, 2019 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1910.1027(m)(1) · Cadmium |
Other-than-serious | $100 | $70 | May 9, 2019 | Final |
1750 Howard Dr, North Mankato, MN 56003 · Welding and Soldering Equipment Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $375 | $262 | Mar 2, 2015 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(ii) · Electrical equipment, general requirements |
Other-than-serious | $100 | $70 | Mar 2, 2015 | Closed |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.1027(d)(1)(i)
(d) Exposure monitoring—(1) General. (i) Each employer who has a workplace or work operation covered by this section shall determine if any employee may be exposed to cadmium at or above the action level.
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)
(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(ii)
(ii) Working space required by this standard may not be used for storage. When normally enclosed live parts are exposed for inspection or servicing, the working space, if in a passageway or general open space, shall be suitably guarded.
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Minnesota the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.