Huntersville, North Carolina · Framing Contractors · NAICS 238130
Dimas Framing LLC has 3 OSHA inspections on record in North Carolina, the first in 2020.
OSHA's last visit started on Oct 16, 2025 as a planned inspection, in Huntersville, and the case has not closed yet.
Across those inspections OSHA issued 7 citation items: 4 serious, 2 repeat and 1 other-than-serious.
OSHA proposed $17,060 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $16,100, down 6%.
Most often, OSHA cited 1926.501, fall protection in construction (3 items).
For context, across all construction employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,080. Dimas Framing LLC averages $5,367 over 3 cited inspections in that time.
Want to know if OSHA cites Dimas Framing LLC again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company18134 Sulton Ter (lot 375), Huntersville, NC 28078 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) · Eye and face protection in construction |
Serious | $750 | $750 | Nov 14, 2025 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $3,310 | $3,310 | Nov 14, 2025 | Final |
12006 Bierce Falls Alley (lot 1), Huntersville, NC 28078 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) · Eye and face protection in construction |
Repeat | $4,000 | $3,600 | Mar 5, 2021 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Repeat | $5,600 | $5,040 | Mar 5, 2021 | Final |
5070 Hyannis Court, Wesley Chapel, NC 28104 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) · Eye and face protection in construction |
Serious | $1,000 | $1,000 | Apr 3, 2020 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $2,100 | $2,100 | Apr 3, 2020 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1) · Fall protection training in construction |
Other-than-serious | $300 | $300 | Apr 3, 2020 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1)
(a) General. (1) The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)
(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1)
(b) Certification of training. (1) The employer shall verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record. The written certification record shall contain the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. If the employer relies on training conducted by another employer or completed prior to the effective date of this section, the certification record shall indicate the date the employer determined the prior training was adequate rather than the date of actual training.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.