OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Dircks Construction LLC: OSHA inspections and violations

Lakeville, Minnesota · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160

3inspections
8citation items
$3,745current penalties
Jul 15, 2021last inspection

OSHA has inspected Dircks Construction LLC 3 times in Minnesota since 2012.

The latest one began on Jul 15, 2021 as a planned inspection, in Saint Peter.

Those inspections ended with 8 citation items: 8 serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $5,325 and now stand at $3,745, 30% lower after settlements or reviews.

Fall protection in construction comes up most often in these citations: 6 items under 1926.501.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and Dircks Construction LLC averages $1,375 (1 cited inspection).

Dircks Construction LLC: OSHA citation items per year, 2012 to 2021
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Dircks Construction LLC again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 345431415 OPENED JUL 15, 2021Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 3 employees at the site · Closed Aug 19, 2021

2029 Pratt Circle, Saint Peter, MN 56082 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 182.653(08)
Serious$250$250Jul 29, 2021Final
Citation 1, item 2a
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$1,125$1,125Jul 29, 2021Final
Citation 1, item 2b
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$0$0Jul 29, 2021Final

Inspection 317937803 OPENED DEC 18, 2014Closed

Planned · Complete · Safety · 3 employees at the site · Closed Apr 21, 2016

12277 River Valley Drive, Burnsville, MN 56058 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$1,750$1,050Jan 13, 2015Final
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$0$0Jan 13, 2015Closed
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction
Serious$1,375$825Jan 13, 2015Final

Inspection 316480516 OPENED APR 17, 2012Closed

Planned · Complete · Safety · 1 employee at the site · Closed Aug 3, 2012

Jacobite Court And 175th St, Lakeville, MN 55044 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$825$495Apr 30, 2012Final
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$0$0Apr 30, 2012Closed

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.1053 · Ladders in construction

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)

(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11)

(11) Steep roofs. Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)

(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.

Other roofing contractors employers in Minnesota

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.