OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Direct Mail Processors, Inc.: OSHA inspections and violations

Hagerstown, Maryland · All Other Business Support Services · NAICS 561499

3inspections
5citation items
$1,350current penalties
Apr 10, 2018last inspection

Since 2005, OSHA inspectors have visited Direct Mail Processors, Inc. in Maryland 3 times.

The most recent inspection opened on Apr 10, 2018 after an accident, in Hagerstown.

In all, OSHA issued 5 citation items: 1 serious and 4 other-than-serious.

The proposed penalties came to $3,050; today they stand at $1,350, 56% less.

The rule cited most here is 1910.303 (electrical equipment, general requirements), 2 times.

Among staffing, cleaning and waste services employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $2,201 penalty. Direct Mail Processors, Inc. averages $675 across 2 cited inspections.

Direct Mail Processors, Inc.: OSHA citation items per year, 2005 to 2018
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Direct Mail Processors, Inc. again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 343077228 OPENED APR 10, 2018Closed

Accident · Partial · Safety · 550 employees at the site · Closed Jul 17, 2018

1150 Conrad Court, Hagerstown, MD 21740 · All Other Business Support Services · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Incident on Apr 10, 2018: Employee suffers bruising to hand when caught in machine

At 11:00 a.m. on April 10, 2018, Employee #1 was working on an envelope inserter machine. He reached through the machine to adjust the papers below the needle area, prior to the conveyor. His right hand became caught in the machine. The employee sustained minor scratches and bruising to his hand.

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii) · Machine guarding
 Serious$3,050$1,350Jun 12, 2018Final

Inspection 342895695 OPENED JAN 24, 2018Closed

Complaint · Partial · Safety · 525 employees at the site · Closed May 9, 2018

1150 Conrad Court, Hagerstown, MD 21740 · All Other Business Support Services · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.36(g)(2) · Exit route design
 Other-than-serious$0$0Apr 17, 2018Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(4) · Exit routes
 Other-than-serious$0$0Apr 17, 2018Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1910.303(e)(1)(ii) · Electrical equipment, general requirements
 Other-than-serious$0$0Apr 17, 2018Final
Citation 1, item 4
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(ii) · Electrical equipment, general requirements
 Other-than-serious$0$0Apr 17, 2018Final

Inspection 308984855 OPENED JUN 29, 2005Open

Complaint · Partial · Safety · 80 employees at the site · Open

1150 Conrad Court, Hagerstown, MD 21740 · Direct Mail Advertising · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

No citations from this inspection so far.

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.212 · Machine guarding

29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii)

(ii) The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, shall be guarded. The guarding device shall be in conformity with any appropriate standards therefor, or, in the absence of applicable specific standards, shall be so designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle.

29 CFR 1910.303 · Electrical equipment, general requirements

29 CFR 1910.303(e)(1)(ii)

(ii) Other markings giving voltage, current, wattage, or other ratings as necessary.

29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(ii)

(ii) Working space required by this standard may not be used for storage. When normally enclosed live parts are exposed for inspection or servicing, the working space, if in a passageway or general open space, shall be suitably guarded.

29 CFR 1910.36 · Exit route design

29 CFR 1910.37 · Exit routes

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.