OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Eastside Construction, LLC.: OSHA inspections and violations

Staunton, Virginia · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160

2inspections
2citation items
$1,365current penalties
Oct 28, 2016last inspection

OSHA has inspected Eastside Construction, LLC. 2 times in Virginia since 2013.

The latest one began on Oct 28, 2016 as a planned inspection, in Waynesboro.

Those inspections ended with 2 citation items: 2 serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $1,365 and still stand at $1,365.

Fall protection in construction comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 1926.501.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and Eastside Construction, LLC. averages $945 (1 cited inspection).

Eastside Construction, LLC.: OSHA citation items per year, 2013 to 2016
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Virginia · latest 90 days of OSHA records

253employers cited

17 of them in the same industry

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Virginia: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in Virginia

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Eastside Construction, LLC. and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 341876266 OPENED OCT 28, 2016Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 6 employees at the site · Closed Feb 17, 2017

657 Wayne Ave, Waynesboro, VA 22980 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$945$945Jan 25, 2017Final

Inspection 317286607 OPENED SEP 18, 2013Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 5 employees at the site · Closed Nov 5, 2013

54 Rowe Road, Staunton, VA 24401 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$420$420Oct 18, 2013Closed

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10)

(10) Roofing work on Low-slope roofs. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width (see appendix A to subpart M of this part), the use of a safety monitoring system alone [i.e. without the warning line system] is permitted.

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)

(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.

Other roofing contractors employers in Virginia

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Virginia the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.