OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Eduardo Rodriguez: OSHA inspections and violations

Watertown, South Dakota · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160

1inspections
8citation items
$17,023current penalties
Oct 23, 2024last inspection

Eduardo Rodriguez has one OSHA inspection on record in South Dakota.

OSHA opened it on Oct 23, 2024 after a complaint, in Watertown, and the case has not closed yet.

From that inspection OSHA issued 8 citation items: 8 serious.

OSHA proposed $17,023 in penalties and the amount has not been reduced.

Most often, OSHA cited 1926.1053, ladders in construction (2 items).

For context, across all construction employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,079. Eduardo Rodriguez averages $17,023 over 1 cited inspection in that time.

Eduardo Rodriguez: OSHA citation items per year, 2024 to 2024
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Eduardo Rodriguez again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 347836603 OPENED OCT 23, 2024Open

Complaint · Partial · Safety · 6 employees at the site · Open

My Place Hotel 3409 8th Avenue Southeast, Watertown, SD 57201 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) · Eye and face protection in construction
 Serious$2,128$2,128Feb 5, 2025Final
Citation 1, item 2a
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii) · Scaffolds, general requirements
 Serious$4,965$4,965Feb 5, 2025Final
Citation 1, item 2b
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(viii)(a) · Earthmovers and forklifts in construction
 Serious$0$0Feb 5, 2025Final
Citation 1, item 3a
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11) · Fall protection in construction
 Serious$4,965$4,965Feb 5, 2025Final
Citation 1, item 3b
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17) · Fall protection systems
 Serious$0$0Feb 5, 2025Final
Citation 1, item 3c
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1) · Fall protection training in construction
 Serious$0$0Feb 5, 2025Final
Citation 1, item 4a
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction
 Serious$4,965$4,965Feb 5, 2025Final
Citation 1, item 4b
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6) · Ladders in construction
 Serious$0$0Feb 5, 2025Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.102 · Eye and face protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1)

(a) General. (1) The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.

29 CFR 1926.1053 · Ladders in construction

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)

(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6)

(6) Ladders shall be used only on stable and level surfaces unless secured to prevent accidental displacement.

29 CFR 1926.451 · Scaffolds, general requirements

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.502 · Fall protection systems

29 CFR 1926.503 · Fall protection training in construction

29 CFR 1926.602 · Earthmovers and forklifts in construction

Other roofing contractors employers in South Dakota

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.