Seneca, South Carolina · All Other Specialty Trade Contractors · NAICS 238990
OSHA has inspected Eks Wall Systems Inc 3 times in South Carolina since 2001.
The latest one began on Aug 9, 2016 as a planned inspection, in Charleston.
Those inspections ended with 7 citation items: 7 serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $3,125 and now stand at $1,487, 52% lower after settlements or reviews.
Scaffolds, general requirements comes up most often in these citations: 3 items under 1926.451.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and Eks Wall Systems Inc averages $1,187 (1 cited inspection).
Want to know if OSHA cites Eks Wall Systems Inc again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company1805 Orleans Road, Charleston, SC 29407 · All Other Specialty Trade Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v) · Aerial lifts |
Serious | $2,000 | $1,000 | Sep 29, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1) · Fall protection training in construction |
Serious | $375 | $187 | Sep 29, 2016 | Final |
Ribaut Road, Beaufort, SC 29902 · All Other Specialty Trade Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.100(a) · Hard hats in construction |
Serious | $150 | $60 | Aug 18, 2003 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.451(c)(1) · Scaffolds, general requirements |
Serious | $200 | $80 | Aug 18, 2003 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1) · Scaffolds, general requirements |
Serious | $200 | $80 | Aug 18, 2003 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 4 29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i) · Scaffolds, general requirements |
Serious | $200 | $80 | Aug 18, 2003 | Closed |
200 Rochester Hwy, Seneca, SC 29672 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Sep 5, 2001 | Closed |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.100(a)
(a) Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets.
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(1)
(c) Criteria for supported scaffolds. (1) Supported scaffolds with a height to base width (including outrigger supports, if used) ratio of more than four to one (4:1) shall be restrained from tipping by guying, tying, bracing, or equivalent means, as follows:
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1)
(1) When scaffold platforms are more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from another scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface shall be used. Crossbraces shall not be used as a means of access.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.