Elixir Extrusions, LLC has 4 OSHA inspections on record in Georgia, the first in 2022.
OSHA's last visit started on May 27, 2025 on a referral, in Douglas.
Across those inspections OSHA issued 5 citation items: 5 serious.
OSHA proposed $22,767 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $21,721, down 5%.
Most often, OSHA cited 1910.212, machine guarding (2 items).
For context, across all manufacturing employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,600. Elixir Extrusions, LLC averages $5,430 over 4 cited inspections in that time.
Elixir Extrusions, LLC also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.
It reported 4 severe injuries to OSHA since 2015.
Want to know if OSHA cites Elixir Extrusions, LLC again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company1300 Pope Drive, Douglas, GA 31533 · Sheet Metal Work Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(2) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $10,641 | $10,641 | Aug 4, 2025 | Final |
1300 Pope Drive, Douglas, GA 31533 · Sheet Metal Work Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.244(a)(1)(ii) · Other portable tools and equipment |
Serious | $5,389 | $3,233 | Jan 11, 2023 | Final |
1300 Pope Drive, Douglas, GA 31533 · All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $6,737 | $4,042 | Jan 5, 2023 | Final |
1300 Pope Drive, Douglas, GA 31533 · All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1b 29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1) · Eye and face protection |
Serious | $0 | $3,804 | Dec 29, 2022 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 1c 29 CFR 1910.138(a) · Gloves and hand protection |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Dec 29, 2022 | Final |
From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.
In 2025, the Douglas site logged 10 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 203 workers: 4.3 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 2.9 for its industry. Those cases cost 9 days away from work.
| Site and year | Workers | Cases | Days-away cases | Rate | Industry median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9008_21626 Douglas · 2025 | 203 | 10 | 1 | 4.3 | 2.9 |
| Elixir Extursions LLC Douglas · 2024 | 204 | 8 | 4 | 3.4 | 3.6 |
| Elixir Extrusions, LLC Douglas · 2017 | 262 | 40 | 12 | 12.2 | 3.6 |
Employers must report any work-related amputation, in-patient hospitalization or loss of an eye to OSHA within 24 hours. 4 reports on file.
May 19, 2025, Douglas: Amputation · amputations, avulsions, enucleations unspecified · finger or thumb tip(s), nail(s)
An employee was pulling metal using a tail stretcher. He pressed the double palm buttons to start the process when the clamp became stuck. The employee pulled on the metal. His left thumb was inside the clamp when it opened, cutting and amputating the tip of his thumb.
May 13, 2023, Douglas: Hospitalization · cuts, lacerations · hand(s), except finger(s)
An employee was cutting a piece on the finishing saw. They went to grab scraps left after cutting and lacerated their right palm. The employee was hospitalized
Dec 16, 2022, Douglas: Hospitalization · fractures · hand(s), unspecified
An employee was servicing a lift table by adding hydraulic fluid. The table came down on his left hand, fracturing three bones.
Nov 23, 2022, Douglas: Hospitalization · cuts, lacerations · hand(s), unspecified
An employee was operating a chassis bender when they noticed oil and began to clean the machine. The employee's right hand was pinned by the mandrel of the bender and the machine, resulting in a contusion and laceration that required stitches.
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1)
(a) General requirements. (1) The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.
29 CFR 1910.138(a)
(a) General requirements. Employers shall select and require employees to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands are exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasions; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes.
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)
(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.