Inspection 349154377 OPENED SEP 4, 2026Open
574 Renee Dr, Joppa, MD 21085 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection so far.
OSHA has inspected Emi Contractors, LLC 2 times in Maryland since 2024.
The latest one began on Sep 4, 2026 after an accident, in Joppa; the case is still open.
Those inspections ended with 5 citation items: 4 serious and 1 other-than-serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $812 and still stand at $812.
Fall protection systems comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 1926.502.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and Emi Contractors, LLC averages $812 (1 cited inspection).
Maryland · latest 90 days of OSHA records
195employers cited
38 of them in the same industry
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Maryland: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
See who gets cited nextLatest cited in Maryland
Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Emi Contractors, LLC and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.
Watch this company574 Renee Dr, Joppa, MD 21085 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection so far.
1410 Forest Drive, Annapolis, MD 21403 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) · Eye and face protection in construction |
Serious | $375 | $375 | Sep 19, 2024 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2a 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $437 | $437 | Sep 19, 2024 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2b 29 CFR 1926.502(d) · Fall protection systems |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Sep 19, 2024 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2c 29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17) · Fall protection systems |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Sep 19, 2024 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1) · Fall protection training in construction |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Sep 19, 2024 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1)
(a) General. (1) The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11)
(11) Steep roofs. Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.
29 CFR 1926.502(d)
(d) Personal fall arrest systems. Personal fall arrest systems and their use shall comply with the provisions set forth below. Effective January 1, 1998, body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. Note: The use of a body belt in a positioning device system is acceptable and is regulated under paragraph (e) of this section.
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Maryland the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.