OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Ems Group Inc.: OSHA inspections and violations

Saint Louis, Missouri · Metal Window and Door Manufacturing · NAICS 332321

3inspections
8citation items
$8,188current penalties
Jul 10, 2024last inspection

Ems Group Inc. has 3 OSHA inspections on record in Missouri, the first in 1999.

OSHA's last visit started on Jul 10, 2024 after a complaint, in Saint Louis.

Across those inspections OSHA issued 8 citation items: 5 serious and 3 other-than-serious.

OSHA proposed $13,080 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $8,188, down 37%.

Most often, OSHA cited 1910.134, respiratory protection (3 items).

For context, across all manufacturing employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,600. Ems Group Inc. averages $5,808 over 1 cited inspection in that time.

Ems Group Inc. also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.

Ems Group Inc.: OSHA citation items per year, 1999 to 2024
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Ems Group Inc. again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 347611584 OPENED JUL 10, 2024Closed

Complaint · Partial · Health · 30 employees at the site · Closed Feb 24, 2025

5410 N. Euclid, Saint Louis, MO 63115 · Metal Window and Door Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding
Serious$9,680$5,808Nov 4, 2024Final
Citation 2, item 1a
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1) · Respiratory protection
Other-than-serious$0$0Nov 4, 2024Final
Citation 2, item 2b
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2) · Respiratory protection
Other-than-serious$0$0Nov 4, 2024Final

Inspection 338910292 OPENED FEB 15, 2013Closed

Planned · Complete · Safety · 15 employees at the site · Closed Jun 5, 2013

5410 N. Euclid, Saint Louis, MO 63115 · Metal Window and Door Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1) · Guarding floor and wall openings and holes
Serious$1,360$952Mar 7, 2013Final
Citation 1, item 2a
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1) · Respiratory protection
Serious$1,020$714Mar 7, 2013Final
Citation 1, item 2b
29 CFR 1910.1200(h) · Hazard communication
Serious$0$0Mar 7, 2013Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i) · Lockout/tagout
Serious$1,020$714Mar 7, 2013Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1910.179(b)(5) · Overhead and gantry cranes
Other-than-serious$0$0Mar 7, 2013Final

Inspection 302256789 OPENED APR 6, 1999Closed

Planned · No inspection · Safety · Closed Apr 6, 1999

5410 N Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO 63115 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

No citations from this inspection.

Injury and illness logs

From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.

In 2025, the Saint Louis site logged 3 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 50 workers: 6.5 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 1.9 for its industry. Those cases cost 10 days away from work.

Site and yearWorkersCasesDays-away casesRateIndustry median
EMS Group, Inc
Saint Louis · 2025
50 316.51.9

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.1200 · Hazard communication

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)

(h) Post-mortem data: Increased incidence and/or severity of post-mortem findings may be indicative of maternal toxicity. This can include gross or microscopic pathological findings or organ weight data, including absolute organ weight, organ-to-body weight ratio, or organ-to-brain weight ratio. When supported by findings of adverse histopathological effects in the affected organ(s), the observation of a significant change in the average weight of suspected target organ(s) of treated dams (mothers), compared to those in the control group, may be considered evidence of maternal toxicity.

29 CFR 1910.134 · Respiratory protection

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)

(1) The test instrument must have an effective audio-warning device, or a visual-warning device in the form of a screen tracing, that indicates when the test subject fails to hold his or her breath during the test. The test must be terminated and restarted from the beginning when the test subject fails to hold his or her breath during the test. The test subject then may be refitted and retested.

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1)

(1) General. The employer shall provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace. The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.

29 CFR 1910.147 · Lockout/tagout

29 CFR 1910.179 · Overhead and gantry cranes

29 CFR 1910.212 · Machine guarding

29 CFR 1910.23 · Guarding floor and wall openings and holes

Other metal window and door manufacturing employers in Missouri

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.