OSHA has inspected Entrematic once in Kansas.
The inspection began on Apr 24, 2019 after a complaint, in Shawnee.
That inspection ended with 2 citation items: 1 serious and 1 other-than-serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $15,942 and now stand at $10,362, 35% lower after settlements or reviews.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for manufacturing employers since 2015 is $3,600, and Entrematic averages $10,362 (1 cited inspection).
Entrematic also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.
Want to know if OSHA cites Entrematic again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company4174 Powell Drive, Shawnee, KS 66226 · Metal Window and Door Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i) · Lockout/tagout |
Other-than-serious | $5,315 | $2,923 | Jul 26, 2019 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $10,627 | $7,439 | Jul 26, 2019 | Final |
From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.
In 2021, the Shawnee site logged 4 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 43 workers: 4.5 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 3.6 for its industry.
| Site and year | Workers | Cases | Days-away cases | Rate | Industry median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amarr Entrematic Shawnee Shawnee · 2021 | 43 | 4 | 0 | 4.5 | 3.6 |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i)
(6) Periodic inspection. (i) The employer shall conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirements of this standard are being followed.
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii)
(ii) The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, shall be guarded. The guarding device shall be in conformity with any appropriate standards therefor, or, in the absence of applicable specific standards, shall be so designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.