OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

EP Construction, LLC: OSHA inspections and violations

Englewood, Colorado · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160

3inspections
5citation items
$23,320current penalties
Sep 28, 2015last inspection

Since 2015, OSHA inspectors have visited EP Construction, LLC in Colorado 3 times.

The most recent inspection opened on Sep 28, 2015 after a complaint, in Colorado Springs.

In all, OSHA issued 5 citation items: 3 serious and 2 repeat.

The proposed penalties came to $24,320; today they stand at $23,320, 4% less.

The rule cited most here is 1926.501 (fall protection in construction), 3 times.

Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,079 penalty. EP Construction, LLC averages $7,773 across 3 cited inspections.

EP Construction, LLC: OSHA citation items per year, 2015 to 2015
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites EP Construction, LLC again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 340952126 OPENED SEP 28, 2015Closed

Complaint · Partial · Safety · 5 employees at the site · Closed Feb 6, 2019

4225 E. Pikes Peak Ave., Colorado Springs, CO 80910 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction
Serious$1,600$1,600Oct 23, 2015Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.307(d)(1) · Mechanical power-transmission apparatus
Serious$1,320$1,320Oct 23, 2015Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Repeat$15,400$15,400Oct 23, 2015Final

Inspection 340504828 OPENED APR 1, 2015Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 3 employees at the site · Closed Apr 10, 2018

3612 S. Jebel Cir., Aurora, CO 80016 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Repeat$4,000$4,000Apr 16, 2015Final

Inspection 340215037 OPENED JAN 23, 2015Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 5 employees at the site · Closed Nov 10, 2016

10483 East Prentice Place, Englewood, CO 80111 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$2,000$1,000Feb 3, 2015Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.1053 · Ladders in construction

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)

(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.

29 CFR 1926.307 · Mechanical power-transmission apparatus

29 CFR 1926.307(d)(1)

(d) Pulleys—(1) Guarding. Pulleys, any parts of which are 7 feet (2.128 m) or less from the floor or working platform, shall be guarded in accordance with the standards specified in paragraphs (m) and (o) of this section. Pulleys serving as balance wheels (e.g., punch presses) on which the point of contact between belt and pulley is more than 6 ft. 6 in. (1.976 m) from the floor or platform may be guarded with a disk covering the spokes.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)

(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.

Other roofing contractors employers in Colorado

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.